Computing as utility: Managing availability, commitment, and pricing through contingent bid auctions

被引:37
作者
Bhargava, HK [1 ]
Sundaresan, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Sch Management, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, Supply Chain & Informat Syst Dept, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
computing marketplace; electronic auctions; grid computing; on-demand computing; utility computing;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2004.11045806
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Enabled by advances in grid and network computing architectures for the delivery of on-demand computing services, the vision of an e-services economy in which computing will be as ubiquitous as a utility is becoming a possibility in business computing. Major firms in the computing industry such as IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems are focusing on agility and flexibility of computing resources and gearing up for their own versions of on-demand computing and information technology (IT) outsourcing solutions. The successful introduction of these new computing models requires the development of appropriate pricing mechanisms that are consistent with the enabling technologies. Our paper introduces the notion of contingent auctions to address this lacuna. In contingent auctions, users bid for computing resources in an auction, but are relieved from the contract (paying a penalty) if demand is not realized. We study different mechanisms-ranging from an advance commitment (capacity reservation) to no commitment (pay-as-you-go)-under demand uncertainty. We consider markets in which the demand for computing is uncertain and, moreover, users' value of computing and demand realization may be related. We show how the different levels of commitment affect prices, revenues, and resource utilization under different market conditions. Our results reiterate the need to address the availability-commitment dichotomy in the design of business models for on-demand computing and IT outsourcing.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 227
页数:27
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Amram M., 1999, REAL OPTIONS MANAGIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 8 INT C DISTR COMP S
[3]  
AUSUBEL LM, 1997, 9706 U MAR
[4]   Insights and analyses of online auctions [J].
Bapna, R ;
Goes, P ;
Gupta, A .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2001, 44 (11) :42-50
[5]   Metacomputing with MILAN [J].
Baratloo, A ;
Dasgupta, P ;
Karamcheti, V ;
Kedem, ZM .
(HCW '99) - EIGHTH HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, :169-183
[6]  
BEDNARZ A, 2002, NETWORK WORLD, V19, P8
[7]   Contingency pricing for information goods and services under industrywide performance standard [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Sundaresan, S .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 20 (02) :113-136
[8]   Decision support on demand: Emerging electronic markets for decision technologies [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Krishnan, R ;
Muller, R .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1997, 19 (03) :193-214
[9]   Applications of flexible pricing in business-to-business electronic commerce [J].
Bichler, M ;
Kalagnanam, J ;
Katircioglu, K ;
King, AJ ;
Lawrence, RD ;
Lee, HS ;
Lin, GY ;
Lu, Y .
IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2002, 41 (02) :287-302
[10]   Contingent pricing to reduce price risks [J].
Biyalogorsky, E ;
Gerstner, E .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (01) :146-155