Acid mine-drainage toxicity testing

被引:12
作者
Gray, NF [1 ]
O'Neill, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Environm Sci Unit, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
acid mine drainage; toxicity testing; Microtox (R); activated sludge inhibition test; BOD inhibition test;
D O I
10.1023/A:1018414908556
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The BOD inhibition test, the activated sludge respiration inhibition test, and the Microtox(R): Bioassay procedure were examined for their potential as rapid toxicity screening methods for acid mine drainage (AMD) and for setting toxicity threshold levels in receiving waters. The BOD inhibition test proved to be unsuitable due to the high chemical oxygen demand of the toxicant. The long incubation time (minimum 5 d at 20 degrees C) allowed growth of chemoautotrophic bacteria and resulted in excessive flocculation and precipitation of metals, making accurate and meaningful measurements of inhibition impossible. The activated sludge respiration inhibition test was successful in measuring AMD toxicity, and for deriving toxicity threshold levels for the basic heterotrophic community in surface waters. However, it is a very time-consuming technique and is not sensitive enough to be used as a routine screening technique. The variability in toxicity was found to be due to the availability of metals as well as the effect of pH on metabolism. Simple linear models were derived to estimate inhibition within surface waters. Prediction of the inhibition caused by AMD can be made as long as the pH of the river water after mixing and the dilution of the AMD are known. Most accurate predictions are made using equations for specific pH ranges, but a useful estimation of inhibition can be obtained using the general equation: inhibition (%) = -2.34 pH + 6.41 AMD (%) + 22.1. The Microtox(R). Bioassay method, although expensive, was rapid and simple to use. It was the most sensitive test of the three, with the toxic response of marine bacteria increasing notably from 5 to 15 min due to the presence of bivalent metals in the toxicant. The problem of repeatability and reproducibility encountered with the activated sludge inhibition test was overcome with the highly standardised Microtox(R) method, making it an ideal screening method for AMD. However, the advantage of the activated sludge inhibition test is that the types of heterotrophic microorganisms found in activated sludge are similar to those found in receiving waters such as the Avoca River and so more meaningful toxicity threshold values can be obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V17th
[2]  
*BECKM INSTR, 1982, MICR SYST OP MAN
[3]  
BYRNE C, 1995, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V4, P583
[4]  
*DEP ENV, 1982, METH EX WAT ASS MAT
[5]   COMPARISON OF 3 RAPID TOXICITY TEST PROCEDURES - MICROTOX, POLYTOX, AND ACTIVATED-SLUDGE RESPIRATION INHIBITION [J].
ELNABARAWY, MT ;
ROBIDEAU, RR ;
BEACH, SA .
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT, 1988, 3 (04) :361-370
[6]   EVALUATION OF MANUFACTURED INOCULA FOR USE IN THE BOD TEST [J].
FITZMAURICE, GD ;
GRAY, NF .
WATER RESEARCH, 1989, 23 (05) :655-657
[7]  
GRAY NF, 1995, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V4, P481
[8]  
ISENBERG DL, 1993, MICROTOX TOXICITY TE
[9]  
KILROY A, 1994, 15 U DUBL TRIN COLL
[10]  
King E., 1986, TOXIC ASSESS, V1, P27