Making difficult decisions about hospice enrollment: What do patients and families want to know?

被引:62
作者
Casarett, D
Crowley, R
Stevenson, C
Xie, S
Teno, J
机构
[1] Philadelphia Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equity Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Div Geriatr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] San Diego Hospice, San Diego, CA USA
[7] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Ctr Gerontol & Hlth Care Res, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
hospice; decision making; end-of-life care; palliative care; informed consent;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53110.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To define patients' and families' priorities for information about hospice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview. SETTING: Urban, not-for-profit, Medicare-certified hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and families recruited from consecutive hospice information visits. MEASUREMENTS: Understanding of hospice, assessment of the relative importance of eight categories of information (by direct rating and ranking tasks), and nurse observation of shared decision making between patient and family (5-point scale). RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 237 patients and families at a hospice information visit. Forty percent (n=94) said that they knew anything about hospice. Most often, family members made the enrollment decision (n=132, 57%). Of the eight categories of information, patients and families placed the greatest importance on visit frequency (n=143, 60%), payment for hospice (n=140, 59%), and the practical help that hospice provides (n=123, 52%). Principal component factor analysis reduced the categories to three distinct factors reflecting concerns related to impending death, practical support, and changes from established patterns of care. CONCLUSION: Most patients and families who are referred for a hospice information visit know little about hospice and have substantial information needs. Referring physicians and hospice teams may be able to better support hospice enrollment decisions by anticipating common priorities for information.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, MODERN FACTOR ANAL
[2]   ETHNICITY AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PATIENT AUTONOMY [J].
BLACKHALL, LJ ;
MURPHY, ST ;
FRANK, G ;
MICHEL, V ;
AZEN, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (10) :820-825
[3]   Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].
Braddock, CH ;
Edwards, KA ;
Hasenberg, NM ;
Laidley, TL ;
Levinson, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320
[4]   TRANSPARENCY - INFORMED CONSENT IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRODY, H .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1989, 19 (05) :5-9
[5]  
BUCKMAN R, 1992, HOW BREAK BAD NEWS
[6]   How should clinicians discuss hospice for patients with dementia? Anticipating caregivers' preconceptions and meeting their information needs [J].
Casarett, D ;
Takesaka, J ;
Karlawish, J ;
Hirschman, KB ;
Clark, CM .
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (02) :116-122
[7]  
Casarett David J, 2003, Am J Hosp Palliat Care, V20, P205, DOI 10.1177/104990910302000309
[8]   How should clinicians describe hospice to patients and families? [J].
Casarett, DJ ;
Crowley, RL ;
Hirschman, KB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (11) :1923-1928
[9]   ICD-9 code for palliative or terminal care [J].
Cassel, CK ;
Vladeck, BC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (16) :1232-1234
[10]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276