Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers

被引:1694
作者
Steinhauser, AE
Christakis, NA
Clipp, EC
McNeilly, M
McIntyre, L
Tulsky, JA
机构
[1] Program Med Encounter & Palliat Care, Durham, NC USA
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Ctr Geriatr Res Educ & Clin, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] Durham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Study Aging & Human Dev, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Inst Care End Life, Durham, NC USA
[7] Inst Multiculturalism, Durham, NC USA
[8] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[9] Univ Chicago, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 19期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.19.2476
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context A clear understanding of what patients, families, and health care practitioners view as important at the end of life is integral to the success of improving care of dying patients. Empirical evidence de fining such factors, however, is lacking. Objective To determine the factors considered important at the end of life by patients, their families, physicians, and other care providers. Design and Setting Cross-sectional, stratified random national survey conducted in March-August 1999. Participants Seriously ill patients (n = 340), recently bereaved family (n = 332), physicians (n = 361), and other care providers (nurses, social workers, chaplains, and hospice volunteers; n = 429). Main Outcome Measures Importance of 44 attributes of quality at the end of life (5-point scale) and rankings of 9 major attributes, compared in the 4 groups. Results Twenty-six items consistently were rated as being important (>70% responding that item is important) across all 4 groups, including pain and symptom management, preparation for death, achieving a sense of completion, decisions about treatment preferences, and being treated as a "whole person." Eight items received strong importance ratings from patients but less from physicians (P<.001), including being mentally aware, having funeral arrangements planned, not being a burden, helping others, and coming to peace with Clod. Ten items had broad variation within as well as among the 4 groups, including decisions about life-sustaining treatments, dying at home, and talking about the meaning of death. Participants ranked freedom from pain most important and dying at home least important among 9 major attributes. Conclusions Although pain and symptom management, communication with;one's physician, preparation for death, and the opportunity to achieve a sense of completion are important to most, other factors important to quality at the end of life differ by role and by individual. Efforts to evaluate and improve patients' and families' experiences at the end of life must account for diverse perceptions of quality.
引用
收藏
页码:2476 / 2482
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ADDINGTON-HALL J M, 1991, Palliative Medicine, V5, P207, DOI 10.1177/026921639100500305
[2]  
Allen JP, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P474
[3]   RESPONSE RATES AND PERCEIVED QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
CHILDERS, TL ;
FERRELL, OC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (03) :429-431
[4]   Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists [J].
Christakis, NA ;
Iwashyna, TJ .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (21) :2389-2395
[5]  
Christakis Nicholas, 1999, DEATH FORETOLD PROPH
[6]   The promise of a good death [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Emanuel, LL .
LANCET, 1998, 351 :21-29
[7]  
Erikson Erik., 1982, LIFE CYCLE COMPLETED
[8]  
FIELD MJ, 1997, APPROACHING DEATH
[9]  
Fried TR, 1999, ANN INTERN MED, V131, P109, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-131-2-199907200-00006
[10]   LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS DURING TERMINAL ILLNESS - WHO WANTS WHAT [J].
GARRETT, JM ;
HARRIS, RP ;
NORBURN, JK ;
PATRICK, DL ;
DANIS, M .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 8 (07) :361-368