Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the anxiety sensitivity index-3

被引:1435
作者
Taylor, Steven
Zvolensky, Michael J.
Cox, Brian J.
Deacon, Brett
Heimberg, Richard G.
Ledley, Deborah Roth
Abramowitz, Jonathan S.
Holaway, Robert M.
Sandin, Bonifacio
Stewart, Sherry H.
Coles, Meredith
Eng, Winnie
Daly, Erin S.
Arrindell, Willem A.
Bouvard, Martine
Cardenas, Samuel Jurado
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Psychiat, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] Univ Wyoming, Dept Psychol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[5] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Dept Psychol, Madrid, Spain
[8] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS, Canada
[9] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[10] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Psychol, Binghamton, NY USA
[11] CUNY, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[12] Boston Univ, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[13] Vet Affairs Boston Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
[14] Univ Groningen, Dept Clin Psychol, Groningen, Netherlands
[15] Univ Savoie, Dept Psychol, Chambery, France
[16] Univ Mexico, Dept Psychol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
anxiety sensitivity; anxiety sensitivity index; anxiety disorders;
D O I
10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Accumulating evidence suggests that anxiety sensitivity (fear of arousal-related sensations) plays an important role in many clinical conditions, particularly anxiety disorders. Research has increasingly focused on how the basic dimensions of anxiety sensitivity are related to various forms of psychopathology. Such work has been hampered because the original measure-the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)- was not designed to be multidimensional. Subsequently developed multidimensional measures have unstable factor structures or measure only a subset of the most widely replicated factors. Tlierefore, the authors developed, via factor analysis of responses from U.S. and Canadian nonclinical participants (n = 2,361), an 18-item measure, the ASI-3, which assesses the 3 factors best replicated in previous research: Physical, Cognitive, and Social Concerns. Factorial validity of the ASI-3 was supported by confirmatory factor analyses of 6 replication samples, including nonclinical samples from the United States and Canada, France, Mexico, the Netherlands, and Spain (n = 4,494) and a clinical sample from the United States and Canada (n = 390). The ASI-3 displayed generally good performance on other indices of reliability and validity, along with evidence of improved psychometric properties over the original ASI.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 188
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text revision (DSM-IV-TR), DOI [10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr, DOI 10.1176/DSM10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR]
[2]   Taxonicity of anxiety sensitivity: a multi-national analysis [J].
Bernstein, A ;
Zvolensky, MJ ;
Kotov, R ;
Arrindell, WA ;
Taylor, S ;
Sandin, B ;
Cox, BJ ;
Stewart, SH ;
Bouvard, M ;
Cardenas, SJ ;
Eifert, GH ;
Schmidt, NB .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2006, 20 (01) :1-22
[3]   The anxiety sensitivity index: Item analysis and suggestions for refinement [J].
Blais, MA ;
Otto, MW ;
Zucker, BG ;
McNally, RJ ;
Schmidt, NB ;
Fava, M ;
Pollack, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2001, 77 (02) :272-294
[4]  
Brown T. A, 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[5]  
BUTCHER JN, 1976, HDB CROSS NATL MMPI
[6]  
Clark D. M., 1995, SOCIAL PHOBIA DIAGNO, P69, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1997)5:13.0.CO
[7]  
2-6
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[9]   Information criteria for pairwise comparisons [J].
Dayton, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (01) :61-71
[10]   The Anxiety Sensitivity Index - Revised: psychometric properties and factor structure in two nonclinical samples [J].
Deacon, BJ ;
Abramowitz, JS ;
Woods, CM ;
Tolin, DF .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (12) :1427-1449