Seismic risk assessment of transportation network systems

被引:86
作者
Kiremidjian, Anne [1 ]
Moore, James
Fan, Yue Yue
Yazlali, Ozgur
Basoz, Nesrin
Williams, Meredith
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, CATRisk Technol Res, Concord, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Earth Sci Lib, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
network component risk; transportation system risk; direct loss; functionality loss; earthquake hazards;
D O I
10.1080/13632460701285277
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When evaluating the earthquake risk to transportation system it is important to take into account the integrated effect of ground motion, liquefaction, and landslides on the network components and System. In this article, the risk from earthquakes to a transportation system is evaluated in terms of direct loss from damage to bridges and travel delays in the transportation network. The contribution of site effects to the loss from damage to bridges is estimated using the San Francisco Bay area as a test bed. Damage and loss to bridges from ground shaking and ground displacements (vertical and horizontal) from liquefaction and landslides are computed for a magnitude 7.0 scenario earthquake on the Hayward fault in California. It is found that liquefaction damage is the largest contributor to the repair cost which is used as a measure of the loss from damage. The performance of the transportation network is evaluated in terms of travel delay times. Travel delays resulting from damage due to ground shaking and changes in travel times are evaluated for the scenario event under the assumptions of fixed and variable travel demands. It is found that with fixed travel demand, the postevent travel times increase significantly. Travel times remain relatively unchanged and decrease with the variable demand time assumption.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 382
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EARTHQ LOSS EST
[2]  
BASOZ N, 1996, 118 STANF U DEP CIV
[3]  
BASOZ N, 1999, REPORT NATL I BUILDI
[4]  
Boore D.M., 1997, Seismol. Res. Lett, V68, P128, DOI DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.68.1.128
[5]  
Chang S. E., 2000, Earthquake Spectra, V16, P557, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1586127
[6]  
Fan Y, 2003, THESIS U SO CALIFORN
[7]  
KIREMIDJIAN AS, 2002, P 7 NAT C EARTHQ ENG
[8]  
*USGS, 2002, 03214 USGS
[9]  
USGS, 1997, 97745 USGS
[10]  
USGS, 2000, 00444 USGS