Health Economic Studies An Introduction to Cost-benefit, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-utility Analyses

被引:55
作者
Angevine, Peter D. [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Neurol Surg, 710 W 168th St,Room 510, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
health economic analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-benefit analysis; cost-utility analysis; discount rate; decision analysis; quality-adjusted life year;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000576
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. Narrative overview. Objective. To provide clinicians with a basic understanding of economic studies, including cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analyses. Summary of Background Data. As decisions regarding public health policy, insurance reimbursement, and patient care incorporate factors other than traditional outcomes such as satisfaction or symptom resolution, health economic studies are increasingly prominent in the literature. This trend will likely continue, and it is therefore important for clinicians to have a fundamental understanding of the common types of economic studies and be able to read them critically. In this brief article, the basic concepts of economic studies and the differences between cost-benefit, costeffectiveness, and cost-utility studies are discussed. Methods. An overview of the field of health economic analysis is presented. Results. Cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility studies all integrate cost and outcome data into a decision analysis model. These different types of studies are distinguished mainly by the way in which outcomes are valued. Obtaining accurate cost data is often difficult and can limit the generalizability of a study. Conclusion. With a basic understanding of health economic analysis, clinicians can be informed consumers of these important studies.
引用
收藏
页码:S9 / S15
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Bederman S, 2013, AM AC ORTH SURG 2013
[2]
CLEMMER B, 1996, PREVENTION EFFECTIVE, P85
[3]
Changes in the Incidence and Duration of Periods without Insurance [J].
Cutler, David M. ;
Gelber, Alexander M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (17) :1740-1748
[4]
Dasbach E, 1996, PREVENTION EFFECTIVE, P130
[5]
USE AND MISUSE OF THE TERM COST-EFFECTIVE IN MEDICINE [J].
DOUBILET, P ;
WEINSTEIN, MC ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (04) :253-256
[6]
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
[7]
Emohare O, 2014, SPINE J, pS1529
[8]
Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation [J].
Fenwick, Elisabeth ;
Marshall, Deborah A. ;
Levy, Adrian R. ;
Nichol, Graham .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
[9]
Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish lumbar spine study:: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [J].
Fritzell, P ;
Hägg, O ;
Jonsson, D ;
Nordwall, A .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (04) :421-434
[10]
Haddix A C., 1996, Prevention effectiveness: A guide to decision Analysis and economic evaluation, P103