Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review

被引:691
作者
Flory, J [1 ]
Emanuel, E [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Clin Bioeth, Warren G Magnuson Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 292卷 / 13期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Available data suggest that prospective research participants may frequently not understand information disclosed to them in the informed consent process. Little is known about how understanding can be improved. Objective To review research on interventions to improve research participants' understanding of information disclosed in the informed consent process. Data Sources and Study Selection A search of MEDLINE was performed using the terms informed consent and clinical research and informed consent and (comprehension or understanding) from 1966 to March 2004, which included randomized controlled trials, longitudinal trials, and controlled trials with nonrandom allocation that compared the understanding of research participants who had undergone only a standard informed consent process to that of participants who had received an intervention to improve their understanding. A comprehensive bibliography of empirical research on informed consent published in January 1999 was also reviewed, as were personal files and all issues of the journals IRB and Controlled Clinical Trials. Data Extraction Study design, quality criteria, population characteristics, interventions, and outcomes for each trial were extracted. The statistical significance of the interventions' effects on understanding were noted, as were mean scores for understanding for each group of each trial. For those trials that measured the secondary outcomes of satisfaction and willingness to enroll, results were also summarized. Data Synthesis Thirty studies described 42 trials that met inclusion criteria. Of 12 trials of multimedia interventions, 3 showed significant improvement in understanding. Of 15 trials of enhanced consent forms, 6 showed significant improvement in understanding (all P<.05), but 5 of 6 trials were of limited quality, casting doubt on their practical relevance. Of 5 trials of extended discussion, 3 showed significant improvement in understanding (all P<.001) and 2 showed trends toward improvement (P=.054 and P=.08). Of 5 trials of test/feedback, all showed significant improvement in understanding (all P<.05) but were flawed in that they may have mistaken rote memorization for improvement in understanding. Another 5 trials were put into a miscellaneous category and had varying impact on understanding. Some demographic factors, particularly lower education, were associated with less understanding. Satisfaction and willingness to enroll were never significantly diminished by an intervention. Conclusions Efforts to improve understanding through the use of multimedia and enhanced consent forms have had only limited success. Having a study team member or a neutral educator spend more time talking one-on-one to study participants appears to be the most effective available way of improving research participants' understanding; however, further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1593 / 1601
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Randomized, controlled evaluation of a prototype informed consent process for HIV vaccine efficacy trials [J].
Coletti, AS ;
Heagerty, P ;
Sheon, AR ;
Gross, M ;
Koblin, BA ;
Metzger, DS ;
Seage, GR .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2003, 32 (02) :161-169
[12]   Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the eastern cooperative oncology group [J].
Coyne, CA ;
Xu, RH ;
Raich, P ;
Plomer, K ;
Dignan, M ;
Wenzel, LB ;
Fairclough, D ;
Habermann, T ;
Schnell, L ;
Quella, S ;
Cella, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :836-842
[13]  
Daugherty C K, 2000, IRB, V22, P6, DOI 10.2307/3564113
[14]   Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms [J].
Davis, TC ;
Holcombe, RF ;
Berkel, HJ ;
Pramanik, S ;
Divers, SG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (09) :668-674
[15]   Modifying a standard industry clinical trial consent form improves patient information retention as part of the informed consent process [J].
Dresden, GM ;
Levitt, MA .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (03) :246-252
[16]   Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders [J].
Dunn, LB ;
Lindamer, LA ;
Palmer, BW ;
Golshan, S ;
Schneiderman, LJ ;
Jeste, DV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 10 (02) :142-150
[17]   Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: A randomized study of a novel consent procedure [J].
Dunn, LB ;
Lindamer, LA ;
Palmer, BW ;
Schneiderman, LJ ;
Jeste, DV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 158 (11) :1911-1913
[18]   OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT - FORM OR SUBSTANCE [J].
EPSTEIN, LC ;
LASAGNA, L .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1969, 123 (06) :682-&
[19]   Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country [J].
Fitzgerald, DW ;
Marotte, C ;
Verdier, RI ;
Johnson, WD ;
Pape, JW .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9342) :1301-1302
[20]  
Fureman I, 1997, AIDS EDUC PREV, V9, P330