Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits

被引:94
作者
Hall, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Park, Namkee [2 ]
Song, Hayeon [3 ]
Cody, Michael J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Commun Studies, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
deception; online dating; personality traits; self-monitoring; sex differences; strategic misrepresentation; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; AGE PREFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; EVOLUTIONARY; INVOLVEMENT; DECEPTION; APPRAISAL; BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; LOVE;
D O I
10.1177/0265407509349633
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examines factors (including gender, self-monitoring, the big five personality traits, and demographic characteristics) that influence online dating service users' strategic misrepresentation (i. e., the conscious and intentional misrepresentation of personal characteristics). Using data from a survey of online dating service users (N = 5,020), seven categories of misrepresentation-personal assets, relationship goals, personal interests, personal attributes, past relationships, weight, and age-were examined. The study found that men are more likely to misrepresent personal assets, relationship goals, personal interests, and personal attributes, whereas women are more likely to misrepresent weight. The study further discovered that self-monitoring (specifically other-directedness) was the strongest and most consistent predictor of misrepresentation in online dating. Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness also showed consistent relationships with misrepresentation.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 135
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Western Journal of Communication, DOI DOI 10.1080/10570319309374463
[2]  
Barbuto J.E., 2006, J LEADERSH ORG STUD, V12, P30, DOI DOI 10.1177/107179190601200303
[3]   Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love [J].
Barelds, Dick P. H. ;
Barelds-Dijkstra, Pieternel .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2007, 24 (04) :479-496
[4]   PLANS AND THE INITIATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BERGER, CR ;
BELL, RA .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :217-235
[5]   AN ANALYSIS OF THE SELF-MONITORING SCALE [J].
BRIGGS, SR ;
CHEEK, JM ;
BUSS, AH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (04) :679-686
[6]   NONVERBAL EXPECTANCIES AND THE EVALUATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATIONS [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
WALTHER, JB .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1990, 17 (02) :232-265
[7]   SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN MATING [J].
BUSS, DM ;
SCHMITT, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (02) :204-232
[8]   Love on the Internet: involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace [J].
Cornwell, B ;
Lundgren, DC .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 17 (02) :197-211
[9]  
De Backer C., 2008, MATING INTELLIGENCE, P77
[10]  
Ellison N, 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11