CSF flow cytometry greatly improves diagnostic accuracy in CNS hematologic malignancies

被引:179
作者
Bromberg, J. E. C.
Breems, D. A.
Kraan, J.
Bikker, G.
van der Holt, B.
Smitt, P. Sillevis
van den Bent, M. J.
van't Veer, M.
Gratama, J. W.
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Neurooncol, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Hematol, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Chem, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Trials & Stat, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000261909.28915.83
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in comparison with classic cytomorphology for diagnosing CNS localizations of hematologic malignancies, and to evaluate the implications of CSF pleocytosis and protein content in this context. Methods: We reviewed the results of diagnostic evaluations of all CSF samples analyzed for localization of a hematologic malignancy between 2001 and 2004 at our center. Results: A total of 1,054 samples from 219 patients were available for analysis. Sixty patients had a CSF localization diagnosed by positive flow cytometry, cytomorphology, or both. The first sample was positive by flow cytometry in 44 (73%) patients, by cytomorphology in 19 (32%). Four first samples were positive by cytomorphology but negative by flow cytometry. Patients with positive cytomorphology had more frequent clinical symptomatology (95% vs 58%) and CSF pleocytosis (84% vs 25%), and tended to a poorer progression-free survival than patients with positive flow cytometry only. OR for CNS localization in case of CSF pleocytosis was 10.1 (95% Cl 4.9 to 20.8); OR for CNS localization in case of elevated protein content was 2.9 (95% Cl 1.5 to 5.4). Nevertheless, 26 of 137 (19%) patients with normal cell count and protein concentration had a CNS localization. Conclusions: The diagnostic value of flow cytometry is more than twice that of cytomorphology. However, cytomorphologic examination of the CSF has additional diagnostic and possibly prognostic value, and should still be performed in conjunction with flow cytometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1679
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*CLSI, 2006, H43A2 CLSI
[2]   Enhanced detection of malignant lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid by multiparameter flow cytometry [J].
Finn, WG ;
Peterson, LC ;
James, C ;
Goolsby, CL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 110 (03) :341-346
[3]   NEUROIMAGING AND CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID CYTOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASIS [J].
FREILICH, RJ ;
KROL, G ;
DEANGELIS, LM .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 38 (01) :51-57
[4]  
French CA, 2000, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V23, P369, DOI 10.1002/1097-0339(200012)23:6<369::AID-DC1>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-3
[6]   MALIGNANT-CELLS IN CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID (CSF) - MEANING OF A POSITIVE CSF CYTOLOGY [J].
GLASS, JP ;
MELAMED, M ;
CHERNIK, NL ;
POSNER, JB .
NEUROLOGY, 1979, 29 (10) :1369-1375
[7]   High incidence of occult leptomeningeal disease detected by flow cytometry in newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphomas at risk for central nervous system involvement: the role of flow cytometry versus cytology [J].
Hegde, U ;
Filie, A ;
Little, RF ;
Janik, JE ;
Grant, N ;
Steinberg, SM ;
Dunleavy, K ;
Jaffe, ES ;
Abati, A ;
Stetler-Stevenson, M ;
Wilson, WH .
BLOOD, 2005, 105 (02) :496-502
[8]   LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASES - COMPARISON OF CLINICAL-FEATURES AND LABORATORY DATA OF SOLID TUMORS, LYMPHOMAS AND LEUKEMIAS [J].
KAPLAN, JG ;
DESOUZA, TG ;
FARKASH, A ;
SHAFRAN, B ;
PACK, D ;
REHMAN, F ;
FUKS, J ;
PORTENOY, R .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 1990, 9 (03) :225-229
[9]  
Kraan J, 2003, J BIOL REG HOMEOS AG, V17, P223
[10]   Clinical significance of monoclonal B cells in cerebrospinal fluid [J].
Nowakowski, GS ;
Call, TG ;
Morice, WG ;
Kurtin, PJ ;
Cook, RJ ;
Zent, CS .
CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2005, 63B (01) :23-27