Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy

被引:423
作者
Cowan, F [1 ]
Rutherford, M
Groenendaal, F
Eken, P
Mercuri, E
Bydder, GM
Meiners, LC
Dubowitz, LMS
de Vries, LS
机构
[1] Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Dept Neonatal Med, London W12 0NN, England
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Catholic Univ, Dept Paediat Neurol, Rome, Italy
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12658-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The role of intrapartum asphyxia in neonatal encephalopathy and seizures in term infants is not clear, and antenatal factors are being implicated in the causal pathway for these disorders. However, there is no evidence that brain damage occurs before birth. We aimed to test the hypothesis that neonatal encephalopathy, early neonatal seizures, or both result from early antenatal insults. Methods We used brain MRI or post-mortem examination in 351 fullterm infants with neonatal encephalopathy, early seizures, or both to distinguish between lesions acquired antenatally and those that developed in the intrapartum and early post-partum period. We excluded infants with major congenital malformations or obvious chromosomal disorders. Infants were divided into two groups: those with neonatal encephalopathy (with or without seizures), and evidence of perinatal asphyxia (group 1); and those without other evidence of encephalopathy, but who presented with seizures within 3 days of birth (group 2). Findings Brain images showed evidence of an acute insult without established injury or atrophy in 197 (80%) of infants in group 1, MRI showed evidence of established injury in only 2 infants (<1%), although tiny foci of established white matter gliosis, in addition to acute injury, were seen in three of 21 on post-mortem examination. In group 2, acute focal damage was noted in 62 (69%) of infants. Two (3%) also had evidence of antenatal injury. Interpretation Although our results cannot exclude the possibility that antenatal or genetic factors might predispose some infants to perinatal brain injury, our data strongly suggest that events in the immediate perinatal period are most important in neonatal brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 742
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ALNAKEB L, 1999, EUR J PAED NEUROL, V29, P124
  • [2] Pilot study of treatment with whole body hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy
    Azzopardi, D
    Robertson, NJ
    Cowan, FM
    Rutherford, MA
    Rampling, M
    Edwards, AD
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (04) : 684 - 694
  • [3] BADAWI N, 1998, ANTEPARTUM RISK FACT, P1549
  • [4] BADAWI N, 1998, INTRAPARTUM RISK FAC, P1554
  • [5] BARKOVICH AJ, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P427
  • [6] INTRAPARTUM ASPHYXIA - A RARE CAUSE OF CEREBRAL-PALSY
    BLAIR, E
    STANLEY, FJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1988, 112 (04) : 515 - 519
  • [7] *CHILD GROWTH FDN, 1996, BOYS GIRLS 4 IN ON G
  • [8] EARLY DETECTION OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION AND HYPOXIC-ISCHEMIC ENCEPHALOPATHY IN NEONATES USING DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    COWAN, EM
    PENNOCK, JM
    HANRAHAN, JD
    MANJI, KP
    EDWARDS, AD
    [J]. NEUROPEDIATRICS, 1994, 25 (04) : 172 - 175
  • [9] Cowan F, 2000, Semin Neonatol, V5, P127, DOI 10.1053/siny.2000.0011
  • [10] COWAN F, 2003, DEV MED CHILD NE S93, V45, P24