Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial

被引:90
作者
Gibson, C. Michael
Murphy, Sabina A.
Montalescot, Gilles
Morrow, David A.
Ardissino, Diego
Cohen, Marc
Gulba, Dietrich C.
Kracof, Oscar H.
Lewis, Basil S.
Roguin, Nathan
Antman, Elliott M.
Braunwald, Eugene
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Pitie Salpetriere, Inst Coeur, Paris, France
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Hosp, Inst Coeur, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Pavia, Parma, Italy
[6] Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, Newark, NJ USA
[7] Krankenhaus Duren Gem Med Klin 1, Duren, Germany
[8] Kaplan Med Ctr, Rehovot, Israel
[9] Lady Davis Carmel Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[10] Nahariya Hosp, Nahariyya, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.093
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We sought to evaluate whether enoxaparin (ENOX) is superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as adjunctive therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who receive fibrinolytic therapy and subsequently undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by analyzing data from the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial. Background Limited data are available on the use of ENOX compared with UFH as adjunctive therapy in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy and subsequent PCI. Methods A total of 20,479 STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy were randomized to a strategy of ENOX throughout index hospitalization or UFH for at least 48 h, with blinded study drug to continue if PCI was performed. The primary end point of death or recurrent MI through 30 days was compared for ENOX versus UFH among the patients who underwent subsequent PCI (n = 4,676). Results After initial fibrinolysis, fewer patients underwent PCI through 30 days in the ENOX versus the UFH group (22.8% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.027). Among patients who underwent PCI by 30 days, the primary end point occurred in 10.7% of ENOX and 13.8% of UFH patients (0.77 relative risk; p < 0.001). There were no differences in major bleeding for ENOX versus UFH (1.4% vs. 1.6%; p = NS). Results were similar when PCI was carried out in patients receiving blinded study drug during PCI (n = 2,178). Conclusion Among patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI who underwent subsequent PCI, ENOX administration was associated with a reduced risk of death or recurrent MI without difference in the risk of major bleeding. The strategy of ENOX support for fibrinolytic therapy followed by PCI is superior to UFH and provides a seamless transition from the medical management to the interventional management phase of STEMI without the need for introducing a second anticoagulant in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:2238 / 2246
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction [J].
Antman, EM ;
Morrow, DA ;
McCabe, CH ;
Murphy, SA ;
Ruda, M ;
Sadowski, Z ;
Budaj, A ;
López-Sendón, JL ;
Guneri, S ;
Jiang, F ;
White, HD ;
Fox, KAA ;
Braunwald, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (14) :1477-1488
[2]   Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Design and rationale for the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) [J].
Antman, EM ;
Morrow, DA ;
McCabe, CH ;
Jiang, F ;
White, HD ;
Fox, KAA ;
Sharma, D ;
Chew, P ;
Braunwald, E .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 149 (02) :217-226
[3]  
Antman EM, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P2310
[4]   Low-mollecular-weight heparin vs. unfractionated heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: A combined analysis [J].
Borentain, M ;
Montalescot, G ;
Bouzamondo, A ;
Choussat, R ;
Hulot, JS ;
Lechat, P .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (02) :212-221
[5]   A subgroup analysis of the impact of prerandomization antithrombin therapy on outcomes in the SYNERGY trial: Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes [J].
Cohen, Marc ;
Mahaffey, Kenneth W. ;
Pieper, Karen ;
Pollack, Charles V. ;
Antman, Elliott M. ;
Hoekstra, James ;
Goodman, Shaun G. ;
Langer, Anatoly ;
Col, Jacques J. ;
White, Harvey D. ;
Califf, Robert M. ;
Ferguson, James J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 48 (07) :1346-1354
[6]  
Ferguson JJ, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V292, P45
[7]   Molecular regulation of platelet-dependent thrombosis [J].
Freedman, JE .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) :2725-2734
[8]   Early and long-term clinical outcomes associated with reinfarction following fibrinolytic administration in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trials [J].
Gibson, CM ;
Karha, J ;
Murphy, SA ;
James, D ;
Morrow, DA ;
Cannon, CP ;
Glugliano, RP ;
Antman, EM ;
Braunwald, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (01) :7-16
[9]   Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) :13-20
[10]  
KNATTERUD G, 1988, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V260, P2849