A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression

被引:101
作者
Cant, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Large Anim Res Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1997.0589
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Reproductive skew is a measure of the way breeding is distributed among the members of an animal society or group. Up to now, explanations of patterns of skew have been limited to one particular model, which assumes that a single dominant has full control over the distribution of subordinate reproduction. If this control is incomplete or absent, however, unsanctioned breeding by subordinate females will increase the total number of young produced. Here I present a new model for the evolution of skew that considers the effect of brood size on the inclusive fitness of dominants and subordinates. By augmenting brood size, a subordinate female reduces the per capita fitness of a dominant's offspring, so the net benefits of producing young are lower for related subordinates. I consider the stable level of skew when both dominant and subordinate attempt to maximize their inclusive fitness under two conditions: (1) when the dominant is unable to anticipate that a subordinate will add to her brood; and (2) the dominant does anticipate subordinate reproduction and can respond by adjusting her own brood size. In the first case, the model predicts that reproductive skew will increase with relatedness between breeders, because related subordinates are selected to add fewer young to the dominant's brood. In the second case, the dominant's optimal response to the presence of a second breeder exaggerates the relationship between relatedness and skew: dominants should produce more young when breeding with related compared with unrelated subordinates. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology
[2]  
Brown J.L., 1987, HELPING COMMUNAL BRE
[3]   BREEDING SUCCESS OF A COMMUNAL GALLINULE [J].
CRAIG, JL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1980, 6 (04) :289-295
[4]   SOCIALITY, GROUP-SIZE, AND REPRODUCTIVE SUPPRESSION AMONG CARNIVORES [J].
CREEL, S ;
MACDONALD, D .
ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL 24, 1995, 24 :203-257
[5]  
Emlen S.T., 1991, P301
[6]   PARENT OFFSPRING CONFLICT AND THE RECRUITMENT OF HELPERS AMONG BEE-EATERS [J].
EMLEN, ST ;
WREGE, PH .
NATURE, 1992, 356 (6367) :331-333
[7]  
Grafen A., 1991, P5
[8]   BIOLOGICAL SIGNALS AS HANDICAPS [J].
GRAFEN, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 144 (04) :517-546
[9]  
HAMILTON WD, 1964, J THEOR BIOL, V7, P1, DOI [10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4, 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6]
[10]   PARTITIONING OF REPRODUCTION IN ANIMAL SOCIETIES [J].
KELLER, L ;
REEVE, HK .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (03) :98-102