Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer

被引:28
作者
Cooper, GS
Yuan, Z
Chak, A
Rimm, AA
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Div Gastroenterol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2000.106685
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic examinations of the colon are often recommended for surveillance following colorectal cancer resection. The actual use and outcome of this testing are not known. Methods: Five thousand seven hundred sixteen patients 65 years of age or older with local or regional stage colorectal cancer diagnosed in 1991 were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry. All inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims from 6 months after diagnosis through the end of 1994 were examined to determine use of endoscopic procedures. Results: One or more colonoscopies were performed in 51%, with an average of 2.9 procedures performed among those tested; sigmoidoscopy was performed in 17%. The rate of colonoscopy was highest during the initial 18 months. Polypectomy was performed in 21% of all patients, and subsequent primary colorectal tumors were diagnosed in 1.3%. Factors associated with colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy use included younger age, survival through follow-up, and geographic region; sigmoidoscopy was also more common in relation to rectal cancers. Conclusions: There is variability in the use of endoscopic procedures following potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer, with patient-related factors and local practice patterns accounting for the variation. Further studies are needed to elicit the reasons for lack of follow-up and adherence to practice guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] *AM SOC COL RECT S, 1992, DIS COLON RECTUM, V35, P389
  • [2] CANCER INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS 65 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER
    BARANOVSKY, A
    MYERS, MH
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1986, 36 (01) : 26 - 41
  • [3] DOES METHODIC LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFFECT SURVIVAL AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION OF COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA
    BOHM, B
    SCHWENK, W
    HUCKE, HP
    STOCK, W
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [4] FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER - A METAANALYSIS
    BRUINVELS, DJ
    STIGGELBOUT, AM
    KIEVIT, J
    VANHOUWELINGEN, HC
    HABBEMA, JDF
    VANDEVELDE, CJH
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [5] BUHLER H, 1984, CANCER, V54, P791, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840901)54:5<791::AID-CNCR2820540502>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-R
  • [7] American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997
    Byers, T
    Levin, B
    Rothenberger, D
    Dodd, GD
    Smith, RA
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) : 154 - &
  • [8] CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF METACHRONOUS COLORECTAL-CANCER
    CALI, RL
    PITSCH, RM
    THORSON, AG
    WATSON, P
    TAPIA, P
    BLATCHFORD, GJ
    CHRISTENSEN, MA
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (04) : 388 - 393
  • [9] COLONOSCOPIC FOLLOW-UP OF COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA
    CHEN, F
    STUART, M
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (06) : 568 - 572
  • [10] Cooper GS, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V85, P2124, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2124::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO