An examination of the UK treasury's evidence base for cost and time overrun data in UK value-for-money policy and appraisal

被引:45
作者
Pollock, Allyson M. [1 ]
Price, David [1 ]
Player, Stewart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Int Publ Hlth Policy, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00568.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
UK government procurement policy rests on Treasury claims that the private finance initiative (PFI) has reduced cost and time overruns. We review the five studies cited by the Treasury in support of this claim and find that only one purports to compare PFI with traditional procurement. The results of this single study are uninterpretable because of selection bias, small sample size (only 11 out of 451 PFI projects are included) and fundamental flaws in the analysis. There is thus no evidence to support the Treasury cost and time overrun claims of improved efficiency in PFI. We conclude that Treasury appraisal guidance, the 'Green Book' which compares PFI with other methods of procurement, is not evidence based but biased to favour PFI.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PFI CONSTR PERF
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMPR PUBL SERV BETT
[3]  
BENTLEY N, 2006, GUARDIAN 0203
[4]   Pump-priming the PFI: Why are privately financed hospital schemes being subsidized? [J].
Gaffney, D ;
Pollock, AM .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 1999, 19 (01) :55-62
[5]  
Gershon P., 1999, REV CIVIL PROCUREMEN
[6]  
HM Treasury, 2003, PFI: Meeting the Investment Challenge
[7]  
Latham M., 1994, CONSTRUCTING TEAM FI
[8]  
MacDonald Mott., 2002, REV LARGE PUBLIC PRO
[9]  
TIMMINS N, 2006, FINANCIAL TIMES 0208