Diagnostic potential in bladder cancer of a panel of tumor markers (calreticulin, γ-synuclein, and catechol-o-methyltransferase) identified by proteomic analysis

被引:91
作者
Iwaki, H
Kageyama, S
Isono, T
Wakabayashi, Y
Okada, Y
Yoshimura, K
Terai, A
Arai, Y
Iwamura, H
Kawakita, M
Yoshiki, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[2] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Cent Res Lab, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[3] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Okayama 7108602, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
[5] Kobe City Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Kobe, Hyogo 6500046, Japan
来源
CANCER SCIENCE | 2004年 / 95卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03183.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Using proteomic analysis, we previously identified calreticulin (CRT) as a potentially useful urinary marker for bladder cancer. Now, we have also identified gamma-synuclein (SNCG) and a soluble isoform of catechol-o-methyltransferase (s-COMT) as novel candidates for tumor markers in bladder cancer, by means of proteomic analysis. In the process of establishing a superior tumor marker system, we investigated the diagnostic value of a combination assay of these three proteins. Voided urine samples were obtained from 112 bladder cancer and 230 control patients. Urinary CRT, SNCG, and s-COMT were measured as a combined marker by quantitative western blot analysis. Relative concentration of each protein was calculated and the diagnostic value of a concomitant examination of these markers was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic analysis. With the best diagnostic cutoff, the overall sensitivity of the combined markers was 76.8% (95% confidence interval, 69-81%) with a specificity of 77.4% (72-80%), while those of a single use of CRT were 71.4% and 77.8%, respectively. When evaluated in relation to tumor characteristics, such as grade, stage, size, and outcome of urinary cytology, the diagnostic capacity of the combined markers was equal to or better than that of CRT in all categories. Concomitant use of CRT, SNCG, and s-COMT had higher sensitivity for detection of bladder cancer than did single use of CRT. Our study suggests that use of this panel of markers will improve the diagnosis of bladder cancer and may allow the development of a protein microarray assay or multi-channel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 961
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Urine cytology - Is it still the gold standard for screening?
    Brown, FM
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (01) : 25 - +
  • [2] Bruening W, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P2154, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2154::AID-CNCR23>3.3.CO
  • [3] 2-0
  • [4] Dawling S, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P6716
  • [5] *FDN PROM CANC RES, CANC STAT JAP 2003
  • [6] Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. A systematic review
    Glas, AS
    Roos, D
    Deutekom, M
    Zwinderman, AH
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Kurth, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 1975 - 1982
  • [7] Gupta A, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P664
  • [8] Huang CS, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P4870
  • [9] Isono T, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P2187
  • [10] Cancer statistics, 2003
    Jemal, A
    Murray, T
    Samuels, A
    Ghafoor, A
    Ward, E
    Thun, MJ
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2003, 53 (01) : 5 - 26