The impact of timing and duration of grass control on growth of a young Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation

被引:57
作者
Adams, PR
Beadle, CL
Mendham, NJ
Smethurst, PJ
机构
[1] Forestry Tasmania, Cooperat Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Forestry, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Agr Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Forestry Tasmania, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[4] CSIRO Forestry & Forest Prod, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
competition; critical period method; eucalypts; grass; soil water and nitrogen;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024490707175
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Interference by an introduced grass, Holcus lanatus L. ( Yorkshire fog grass) in a young E. globulus ( Tasmanian blue gum) plantation was investigated. The objectives were to determine (1) the 'critical period' of competition, and (2) how the timing and duration of competition was related to the interaction between tree growth and resource availability. This was investigated during the first two years of establishment. Weed interference was severe with height and diameter growth of weedy trees being 52% and 40% of weed-free trees, respectively, at age two years. Most growth losses occurred during the first year. The critical period of weed interference was from planting to age 18 m and effective weed control was required for this period to maximise tree growth potential. The application of nitrogen to weedy trees promoted a significant growth response suggesting that competition for nitrogen was occurring. There was no significant response to level of irrigation. The use of critical period analysis is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 165
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ADAMS PR, 1995, FRI B, V192, P179
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Principles in Weed Management
[3]  
BALNEAVES J M, 1982, New Zealand Journal of Forestry, V27, P259
[4]  
BLEASDALE JKA, 1987, PLANT PHYSL RELATION
[5]  
BOOMSMA DB, 1990, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V30, P455, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90154-4
[6]  
BURNS K, 1999, FOREST PLANTATIONS C
[7]  
Caldwell J. M., 1995, New Forests, V10, P1
[8]  
CHONG TK, 1982, MALAYS FOR, V45, P558
[9]   Growth dynamics and water uptake of two forest grasses differing in their growth strategy and potentially competing with forest seedlings [J].
Collet, C ;
Frochot, H ;
Guehl, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1996, 74 (10) :1555-1561
[10]  
Costantini A., 1992, Commonwealth Forestry Review, V71, P117