Modelling the secondary structures of slippage-prone hypervariable RNA regions: the example of the tiger beetle 18S rRNA variable region V4

被引:19
作者
Hancock, JM [1 ]
Vogler, AP
机构
[1] Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll Sch Med, MRC, Clin Sci Ctr,Gene & Genome Evolut Grp, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Nat Hist Museum, Dept Entomol, London SW7 5BD, England
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Biol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/26.7.1689
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Variable regions within ribosomal RNAs frequently vary in length as a result of incorporating products of slippage. This makes constructing secondary-structure models problematic because base homology is difficult or impossible to establish between species. Here, we model such a region by comparing the results of the MFOLD suboptimal folding algorithm for different species to identify conserved structures. Based on the reconstruction of base change on a phylogenetic tree of the species and comparison against null models of character change, we devise a statistical analysis to assess support of these structures from compensatory and semi-compensatory (i.e. G.C to G.U or A.U to G.U) mutations. As a model system we have used variable region V4 from cicindelid (tiger beetle) small subunit ribosomal RNAs (SSU rRNAs). This consists of a mixture of conserved and highly variable subregions and has been subject to extensive comparative analysis in the past. The model that results is similar to a previously described model of this variable region derived from a different set of species and contains a novel structure in the central, highly variable part. The method we describe may be useful in modelling other RNA regions that are subject to slippage.
引用
收藏
页码:1689 / 1699
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution
[2]   THE PRODUCT OF THE MOUSE XIST GENE IS A 15 KB INACTIVE X-SPECIFIC TRANSCRIPT CONTAINING NO CONSERVED ORF AND LOCATED IN THE NUCLEUS [J].
BROCKDORFF, N ;
ASHWORTH, A ;
KAY, GF ;
MCCABE, VM ;
NORRIS, DP ;
COOPER, PJ ;
SWIFT, S ;
RASTAN, S .
CELL, 1992, 71 (03) :515-526
[3]   COMPILATION OF SMALL RIBOSOMAL-SUBUNIT RNA SEQUENCES [J].
DERIJK, P ;
NEEFS, JM ;
VANDEPEER, Y ;
DEWACHTER, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1992, 20 :2075-2089
[4]  
*GCG, 1994, PROGR MAN WISC PACK
[5]   LESSONS FROM AN EVOLVING RIBOSOMAL-RNA - 16S AND 23S RIBOSOMAL-RNA STRUCTURES FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE [J].
GUTELL, RR ;
LARSEN, N ;
WOESE, CR .
MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1994, 58 (01) :10-26
[6]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF DNA SLIPPAGE TO EUKARYOTIC NUCLEAR 18S-RIBOSOMAL-RNA EVOLUTION [J].
HANCOCK, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1995, 40 (06) :629-639
[7]  
HANCOCK JM, 1988, MOL BIOL EVOL, V5, P393
[8]  
HANCOCK JM, 1988, MOL BIOL EVOL, V5, P377
[9]   REPLICATION SLIPPAGE IN THE EVOLUTION OF POTYVIRUSES [J].
HANCOCK, JM ;
CHALEEPROM, W ;
CHALEEPROM, W ;
DALE, J ;
GIBBS, A .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1995, 76 :3229-3232
[10]   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF THE 18-S RIBOSOMAL-RNA OF THE INSECT SPECIES TENEBRIO-MOLITOR [J].
HENDRIKS, L ;
DEBAERE, R ;
VAN BROECKHOVEN, C ;
DEWACHTER, R .
FEBS LETTERS, 1988, 232 (01) :115-120