Open pulled straws for vitrification of mature mouse oocytes preserve patterns of meiotic spindles and chromosomes better than conventional straws

被引:73
作者
Chen, SU [1 ]
Lien, YR [1 ]
Chen, HF [1 ]
Chao, KH [1 ]
Ho, HN [1 ]
Yang, YS [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
conventional straws; meiotic spindle; oocyte vitrification; open pulled straws;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/15.12.2598
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Vitrification of oocytes has been applied recently for humans, but remains elusive. The microtubules of oocytes are vulnerable to cryoprotectants and thermal changes. Using mouse oocytes, the effects of vitrification in open pulled straws (OPS) were investigated on survival, the meiotic spindle, and chromosomes and compared with conventional straws. Mature oocytes were allocated to four groups for exposure to cryoprotectants, vitrification in conventional straws, or vitrification in OPS. They were diluted in stepwise sucrose solutions. Oocytes without treatments mere used as controls. The surviving oocytes were stained for meiotic spindles and chromosomes, After dilution, all of the oocytes exposed to cryoprotectants survived. Vitrification sometimes resulted in lysis so that survival using OPS (62%) was significantly (P < 0.05) smaller than that using conventional straws (81%). Oocytes exposed to cryoprotectants or vitrified exhibited serious disturbances of microtubules immediately post-dilution, After 1 h incubation, the microtubules could repolymerize so that the OPS group had significantly (P < 0.05) more normal spindles (78%) than did the conventional straw group (21%). The former also tended to have more compact chromosomes (87%) than did the latter (78%). OPS for vitrification of oocytes achieve more rapid cooling, warming, and dilution and so reduce spindle injury. However, the lower survival rate in OPS needs improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:2598 / 2603
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] THE INFLUENCE OF SLOW AND ULTRA-RAPID FREEZING ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MEIOTIC SPINDLE OF THE MOUSE OOCYTE
    AIGNER, S
    VANDERELST, J
    SIEBZEHNRUBL, E
    WILDT, L
    LANG, N
    VANSTEIRTEGHEM, AC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1992, 7 (06) : 857 - 864
  • [2] Cryopreservation of human oocytes: A review of current problems and perspectives
    Bernard, A
    Fuller, BJ
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1996, 2 (03) : 193 - 207
  • [3] PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION
    CHEN, C
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8486) : 884 - 886
  • [4] Alterations of the cytoskeleton and polyploidy induced by cryopreservation of metaphase II mouse oocytes
    Eroglu, A
    Toth, TL
    Toner, M
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (05) : 944 - 957
  • [5] CRYOPRESERVATION OF MOUSE AND HUMAN OOCYTES USING 1,2-PROPANEDIOL AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE MEIOTIC SPINDLE
    GOOK, DA
    OSBORN, SM
    JOHNSTON, WIH
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1993, 8 (07) : 1101 - 1109
  • [6] Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods
    Hong, SW
    Chung, HM
    Lim, JM
    Ko, JJ
    Yoon, TK
    Yee, B
    Cha, KY
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (01) : 142 - 146
  • [7] Changes in membrane integrity, cytoskeletal structure, and developmental potential of murine oocytes after vitrification in ethylene glycol
    Hotamisligil, S
    Toner, M
    Powers, RD
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1996, 55 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [8] VITRIFICATION OF HUMAN OOCYTES FOLLOWING MINIMAL EXPOSURE TO CRYOPROTECTANTS - INITIAL STUDIES ON FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYONIC-DEVELOPMENT
    HUNTER, JE
    FULLER, BJ
    BERNARD, A
    JACKSON, A
    SHAW, RW
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (05) : 1184 - 1188
  • [9] EFFECTS OF 1,2-PROPANEDIOL ON THE CYTOSKELETAL ORGANIZATION OF THE MOUSE OOCYTE
    JOLY, C
    BCHINI, O
    BOULEKBACHE, H
    TESTART, J
    MARO, B
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1992, 7 (03) : 374 - 378
  • [10] Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes
    Kuleshova, L
    Gianaroli, L
    Magli, C
    Ferraretti, A
    Trounson, A
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (12) : 3077 - 3079