Ankle and subtalar kinematics measured with intracortical pins during the stance phase of walking

被引:115
作者
Arndt, A [1 ]
Westblad, P
Winson, I
Hashimoto, T
Lundberg, A
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Dept Orthoped Surg K54, Karolinska Inst, Biomech Lab, S-14186 Huddinge, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Sports, Dept Hlth & Sport Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
ankle joint; in vivo kinematics; subtalar joint; weightbearing;
D O I
10.1177/107110070402500514
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The absence of external landmarks on the talus has rendered the description of ankle and subtalar joint kinematics difficult. Abnormal motion at these joints has, however, been implied in the etiology of an array of lower extremity overuse injuries. Methods: Intracortical pins were inserted under local anesthesia in the tibia, talus, and calcaneus with external marker clusters traced by a video motion analysis system. Kinematic data were collected during walking trials on a flat surface for three subjects. Gait pattern was monitored by comparison of ground reaction force curves during stance phase with and without the pins inserted. Results: Results were presented in terms of helical axis orientation for both joints and the component rotations about these axes. Large intersubject differences were seen in both ankle and subtalar joint helical axis orientation. Maximum rotations over the complete stance phase for the ankle and subtalar joints respectively were: eversion/inversion, 6.3degrees and 8.3degrees; dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, 18.7degrees and 3.7degrees; and abduction/adduction, 5.0degrees and 6.1degrees. Conclusions: The majority of ankle eversion/inversion occurred at the subtalar joint; however, the ankle component cannot be ignored. Abduction/adduction range of motion at the subtalar joint was surprisingly high, indicating that this component motion during walking is not purely attributable to the ankle joint. Future research should include greater subject numbers in order to present more universally applicable results. Clinical Relevance: The in vivo kinematics of the talus during weightbearing activity are poorly understood. The description of this motion may assist in the structuring of clinical rehabilitation and in the design and insertion of ankle joint prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A METHOD TO DETERMINE THE RANGE OF MOTION OF THE ANKLE JOINT COMPLEX, INVIVO [J].
ALLINGER, TL ;
ENGSBERG, JR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 26 (01) :69-76
[2]   3-DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT OF REARFOOT MOTION DURING RUNNING [J].
AREBLAD, M ;
NIGG, BM ;
EKSTRAND, J ;
OLSSON, KO ;
EKSTROM, H .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (09) :933-940
[3]  
BAHLSEN A, 1988, THESIS U CALGARY CAN
[4]  
Clarke TE, 1984, SPORT SHOES PLAYING, P166
[5]  
Close J R, 1967, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V50, P159
[6]  
ENGSBERG JR, 1987, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V19, P275
[7]   A VIDEO-BASED TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING ANKLE-SUBTALAR MOTION DURING STANCE [J].
KEPPLE, TM ;
STANHOPE, SJ ;
LOHMANN, KN ;
ROMAN, NL .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 12 (04) :273-280
[8]   On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research [J].
Lundberg, A .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 15 (03) :411-422
[9]   KINEMATICS OF THE ANKLE AND FOOT INVIVO ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY - INTRODUCTION [J].
LUNDBERG, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 60 :1-26
[10]  
LUNDBERG A, 1992, EUR J EXP MUSCULOSKE, V1, P217