Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement

被引:187
作者
Cook, Robert L. [1 ]
Martin, Paul J. [1 ]
Geremia, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Phys & Astron, Quantum Measurement & Control Grp, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature05655
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quantum mechanics hinders our ability to determine the state of a physical system in two ways: individual measurements provide only partial information about the observed system ( because of Heisenberg uncertainty), and measurements are themselves invasive - meaning that little or no refinement is achieved by further observation of an already measured system(1). Theoretical methods have been developed to maximize the information gained from a quantum measurement while also minimizing disturbance(2-4), but laboratory implementation of optimal measurement procedures is often difficult. The standard class of operations considered in quantum information theory(5) tends to rely on superposition-basis and entangled measurements(6), which require high-fidelity implementation to be effective in the laboratory(7). Here we demonstrate that real-time quantum feedback(8-10) can be used in place of a delicate quantum superposition, often called a 'Schrodinger cat state', to implement an optimal quantum measurement for discriminating between optical coherent states(11,12). Our procedure actively manipulates the target system during the measurement process, and uses quantum feedback to modify the statistics of an otherwise sub-optimal operator to emulate the optimal cat-state measurement. We verify a long-standing theoretical prediction(13) and demonstrate feedback-mediated quantum measurement(10,14) at its fundamental quantum limit over a non-trivial region of parameter space.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 777
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase [J].
Armen, MA ;
Au, JK ;
Stockton, JK ;
Doherty, AC ;
Mabuchi, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (13)
[2]   Quantum feedback control and classical control theory [J].
Doherty, AC ;
Habib, S ;
Jacobs, K ;
Mabuchi, H ;
Tan, SM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2000, 62 (01) :13
[3]  
Dolinar S. J., 1973, Report No. 111
[4]  
Fuchs C. A., 1996, THESIS U NEW MEXICO
[5]   Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information [J].
Fuchs, CA ;
Peres, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 53 (04) :2038-2045
[6]   Distinguishing between optical coherent states with imperfect detection [J].
Geremia, JM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2004, 70 (06) :062303-1
[7]   RETRACTED: Real-time quantum feedback control of atomic spin-squeezing (Retracted Article. See vol 321, pg 489, 2008) [J].
Geremia, JM ;
Stockton, JK ;
Mabuchi, H .
SCIENCE, 2004, 304 (5668) :270-273
[8]  
Helstrom C.W, 1976, MATH SCI ENG SERIES
[9]   DETECTION THEORY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS [J].
HELSTROM, CW .
INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1967, 10 (03) :254-&
[10]  
Kraus K, 1983, LECT NOTES PHYS, V190