Ultrasound, a new separation technique to harvest microalgae

被引:154
作者
Bosma, R [1 ]
van Spronsen, WA [1 ]
Tramper, J [1 ]
Wijffels, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Agrotechnol & Food Sci, Food & Bioproc Engn Grp, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
cell filtration; continuous flow; experimental design; microalgae; optimisation; separation process; technique; ultrasonic wave; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023807011027
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this article it is proven that ultrasound can be used to harvest microalgae. The separation process is based on gentle acoustically induced aggregation followed by enhanced sedimentation. In this paper, the efficiency of harvesting and the concentration factor of the ingoing biomass concentration are optimized and the relevance of this process compared to other harvesting processes is determined. For the optimisation, five parameters were modeled simultaneously by the use of an experimental design. An experimental design was chosen, because of possible interaction effects between the different parameters. The efficiency of the process was modeled with a R-squared of 0.88. The ingoing flow rate and the biomass concentration had a lot of influence on the efficiency of the process. Efficiencies higher than 90% were reached at high biomass concentrations and flow rates of 4-6 L day(-1). At most, 92% of the organisms could be harvested and a concentration factor of 11 could be achieved at these settings. It was not possible to harvest this microalga with higher efficiencies due to its small size and its small density difference with water. The concentration factor of the process was modeled with a R-squared of 0.75. The ingoing flow rate, biomass concentration and ratio between harvest flow and ingoing flow rate had a significant effect on the concentration factor. Highest concentration factors, up to 20, could be reached at low biomass concentrations and low harvest flows. On industrial scale, centrifuges can better be used to harvest microalgae, because of lower power consumption, better efficiencies and higher concentration factors. On lab- or pilot-plant scale, an ultrasonic harvesting process has the advantages that it can be operated continuously, it evokes no shear stress and the occupation space is very small. Also, when the algae excrete a soluble high valued product this system can be used as a biofilter.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A comparison of intensive cell culture bioreactors operating with Hybridomas modified for inhibited apoptotic response. [J].
Bierau, H ;
Perani, A ;
Al-Rubeai, M ;
Emery, AN .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 62 (03) :195-207
[2]   Analytical scale ultrasonic standing wave manipulation of cells and microparticles [J].
Coakley, WT ;
Hawkes, JJ ;
Sobanski, MA ;
Cousins, CM ;
Spengler, J .
ULTRASONICS, 2000, 38 (1-8) :638-641
[3]   A NOVEL ULTRASONIC RESONANCE FIELD DEVICE FOR THE RETENTION OF ANIMAL-CELLS [J].
DOBLHOFFDIER, O ;
GAIDA, T ;
KATINGER, H ;
BURGER, W ;
GROSCHL, M ;
BENES, E .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1994, 10 (04) :428-432
[4]  
Groschl H, 1998, ACUSTICA, V84, P815
[5]  
Groschl M, 1998, ACUSTICA, V84, P432
[6]  
Haaland PerryD., 1989, EXPT DESIGN BIOTECHN, DOI 10.1201/9781003065968
[7]   A continuous flow ultrasonic cell-filtering method [J].
Hawkes, JJ ;
Coakley, WT .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 19 (01) :57-62
[8]   Filtration of bacteria and yeast by ultrasound-enhanced sedimentation [J].
Hawkes, JJ ;
Limaye, MS ;
Coakley, WT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :39-47
[9]  
Kashyap S, 1998, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V60, P636, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981205)60:5<636::AID-BIT14>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-A