Response shift theory: Important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability

被引:274
作者
Schwartz, Carolyn E. [1 ]
Andresen, Elena M.
Nosek, Margaret A.
Krahn, Gloria L.
Andresen, Elena [1 ]
Campbell, Vincent [2 ]
Cardinal, Brad [3 ]
Drum, Charles [4 ]
Fujiura, Glenn [5 ]
Hall, Trevor [4 ]
Hammond, Laura [4 ]
Horner-Johnson, Willi [4 ]
Krahn, Gloria [4 ]
Nosek, Margaret [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2007年 / 88卷 / 04期
关键词
disabled persons; psychometrics; quality of life; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.032
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 [康复医学与理疗学];
摘要
Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with disability can be problematic. Ambiguous or paradoxical findings can occur because of differences among people or changes within people regarding internal standards, values, or conceptualization of HRQOL. These "response shifts" can affect standard psychometric indices, such as reliability and validity. Attending to appraisal processes and response shift theory can inform development of HRQOL measures for people with disability that do not confound function and health and that consider important causal indicators such as environment. By design, most HRQOL measures equate function with health, necessarily leading to a lower measured HRQOL in people with functional impairments regardless of their level of self-perceived health. In this article, we present theoretical and conceptual distinctions building on response shift theory and other current developments in HRQOL research. We then submit a set of suggested directions for future measurement development in populations with disabilities that consider these distinctions and extend their use in future measurement developments.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 536
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds [J].
Albrecht, GL ;
Devlieger, PJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (08) :977-988
[2]
Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Fouts, BS ;
Romeis, JC ;
Brownson, CA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (08) :877-884
[3]
Proxy reliability: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Vahle, VJ ;
Lollar, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :609-619
[4]
[Anonymous], ADAPTATION CHANGING
[5]
[Anonymous], 2005, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data
[6]
[Anonymous], RES ORG CHANGE DEV
[7]
LIFE SATISFACTION AND WELL-BEING MEASURES IN VENTILATOR ASSISTED INDIVIDUALS WITH TRAUMATIC TETRAPLEGIA [J].
BACH, JR ;
TILTON, MC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (06) :626-632
[8]
Quality of life as subjective experience:: Reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Hürny, C ;
Maibach, R ;
Herrmann, R ;
Laffer, U .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :775-782
[9]
INDIVIDUAL QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN THE HEALTHY ELDERLY [J].
BROWNE, JP ;
OBOYLE, CA ;
MCGEE, HM ;
JOYCE, CRB ;
MCDONALD, NJ ;
OMALLEY, K ;
HILTBRUNNER, B .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (04) :235-244
[10]
The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization [J].
Carol S Burckhardt ;
Kathryn L Anderson .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)