Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in heart transplant recipients based on exposure-effect modeling

被引:64
作者
Starling, RC [1 ]
Hare, JM
Hauptman, P
McCurry, KR
Mayer, HW
Kovarik, JM
Schmidli, H
机构
[1] Kaufman Ctr Heart Failure, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] St Louis Univ Hosp, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
certican; everolimus; heart transplantation; therapeutic drug monitoring;
D O I
10.1046/j.1600-6143.2004.00601.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor, is an immunosuppressant that targets the primary causes of progressive allograft dysfunction, thus improving the long-term outcome after heart transplantation. The present study investigated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus would benefit heart transplant patients. Data from a twelve-month phase III trial comparing everolimus (1.5 or 3 mg daily) with azathioprine were used to evaluate everolimus pharmacokinetics, exposure-efficacy/safety and TDM prognostic simulations. Everolimus trough levels were stable in the first year post-transplant and averaged 5.2 +/- 3.8 and 9.4 +/- 6.3 ng/mL in patients treated with 1.5 and 3 mg/day, respectively. Cyclosporine trough levels were similar in all treatment groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reduced with everolimus trough levels greater than or equal to3 ng/mL. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis showed evidence of reduced vasculopathy at 12 months with increasing everolimus exposure. Unlike cyclosporine, increasing everolimus exposure was not related to a higher rate of renal dysfunction. The TDM simulation, which was based on two everolimus dose adjustments and an initial starting dose of 1.5 mg/day, showed that the simulated BPAR rate (with TDM) was 21% versus 26% in the group with fixed dosing. Therefore, TDM in heart transplantation could optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:2126 / 2131
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S5
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S1
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S5
[4]   Viral triggers of cardiac-allograft dysfunction. [J].
Avery, RK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (20) :1545-1547
[5]  
Billingham M E, 1990, J Heart Transplant, V9, P587
[6]   The in vivo effect of rapamycin derivative SDZ RAD on lymphocyte proliferation [J].
Böhler, T ;
Waiser, J ;
Budde, K ;
Lichter, S ;
Jauho, A ;
Fritsche, L ;
Korn, A ;
Neumayer, HH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) :2195-2197
[7]   Effect of SDZ RAD on transplant arteriosclerosis in the rat aortic model [J].
Cole, OJ ;
Shehata, M ;
Rigg, KM .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) :2200-2203
[8]  
Day JD, 1995, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V14, pS142
[9]   Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients [J].
Eisen, HJ ;
Tuzcu, EM ;
Dorent, R ;
Kobashigawa, J ;
Mancini, D ;
Valantine-von Kaeppler, HA ;
Starling, RC ;
Sorensen, K ;
Hummel, M ;
Lind, JM ;
Abeywickrama, KH ;
Bernhardt, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (09) :847-858
[10]   CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY ASSESSED BY INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND NONIMMUNOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS [J].
ESCOBAR, A ;
VENTURA, HO ;
STAPLETON, DD ;
MEHRA, MR ;
RAMEE, SR ;
COLLINS, TJ ;
JAIN, SP ;
SMART, FW ;
WHITE, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 74 (10) :1042-1046