Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems

被引:100
作者
Ethiraj, Sendil K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
inventive effort; R&D scope; complex systems; modularity;
D O I
10.1002/smj.622
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. I argue that complex product systems, e.g., personal computers (PCs), are distinguished by junctional interaction among several components, each guided by a relatively autonomous bundle of technical and economic characteristics. I try to explore whether the dynamics of such interactions between components of complex product systems call help us understand changes in the relative allocation of inventive effort. I advance and empirically test three hypotheses: (1) emergence of component constraints (bottlenecks) in product systems will trigger research and development (R&D) investment to resolve the constraints; (2) slack component firms have a strong incentive to invest in resolving component constraints; and (3) the incentive of slack component firms to invest in resolving component constraints is increasing in their prior slink R&D investments in slack components. In sum, I argue that interactions between components in a product system conditions the R&D incentives of firms and also that the incentives are increasing in their prior investments or capabilities. Using product reviews from technical journals, I trace the constraint components in the PC from 1981 to 1998 and attempt to predict shafts in the allocation of inventive effort in the subsequent period. The empirical results strongly support all three hypotheses. This study highlights the paradoxical effect of modularity in complex product systems. Modular design architectures, while contributing to accelerating the pace of technical change, also tend to limit the economic benefits (of firms' component R&D efforts, especially when different components technologies are progressing at different rates. This often creates all impetus to enlarge the scope of firm R&D activities beyond the component product markets that films operate in. Other implications for R&D decision making tire discussed. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 584
页数:22
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks [J].
Almeida, P ;
Kogut, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) :905-917
[2]  
*AMD, 2006, AMD 3 YEAR TECHN OUT
[3]  
Arrow KJ, 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, P609, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024
[4]  
Baldwin C, 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2366.001.0001
[5]   The Architecture of complexity [J].
Barabasi, Albert-Lashlo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2007, 27 (04) :33-42
[6]   Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? [J].
Brusoni, S ;
Prencipe, A ;
Pavitt, K .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 46 (04) :597-621
[7]  
CADAMBI B, 2006, PCI EXPRESS CASE STU
[8]  
Chatterjee S., 2013, Regression analysis by example
[9]  
CHEN A, 2002, INTRO AGP8C ADV MICR
[10]  
Christensen C. M., 1997, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N