Necrotic leiomyoma and gram-negative sepsis eight weeks after uterine artery embolization

被引:26
作者
Aungst, M
Wilson, M
Vournas, K
McCarthy, S
机构
[1] David Grant Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Travis AFB, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Intervent Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Vallejo, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000128107.58898.e1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata is generally safe, but rare life-threatening complications, including sepsis, can result. CASE: A 39-year-old woman with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, who was on chronic warfarin therapy, underwent uterine artery embolization for severe menorrhagia and a 12-cm intracavitary leiomyoma. Eight weeks postembolization, the patient, who had been essentially asymptomatic, presented in septic shock from gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. She underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for a large infarcted necrotic leiomyoma and partial uterine necrosis. The patient's 8-day hospitalization required extended care in the intensive care unit and blood transfusion and resulted in surgical menopause in a patient who is not a candidate for hormone therapy. CONCLUSION: Uterine artery embolization is a procedure not without significant risks. From published case reports, it appears that patients most at risk for severe infection of an infarcted leiomyoma after this procedure are those with a large dominant leiomyoma. (C) 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:1161 / 1164
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Factors affecting early surgical intervention after uterine artery embolization
    Al-Fozan, H
    Tulandi, T
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2002, 57 (12) : 810 - 815
  • [2] Prevention of venous thromboembolism
    Geerts, WH
    Heit, JA
    Clagett, GP
    Pineo, GF
    Colwell, CW
    Anderson, FA
    Wheeler, HB
    [J]. CHEST, 2001, 119 (01) : 132S - 175S
  • [3] Uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma
    Godfrey, CD
    Zbella, EA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (05) : 950 - 952
  • [4] Uterine fibroid embolization: Nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids
    McLucas, B
    Adler, L
    Perrella, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 192 (01) : 95 - 105
  • [5] Review of Readmissions due to complications from uterine fibroid embolization
    Mehta, H
    Sandhu, C
    Matson, M
    Belli, AM
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (12) : 1122 - 1124
  • [6] Serious complications of uterine artery embolization for conservative treatment of fibroids
    Payne, JF
    Haney, AF
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (01) : 128 - 131
  • [7] Hysterectomy for complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma: Results of a Canadian multicenter clinical trial
    Pron, G
    Mocarski, E
    Cohen, M
    Colgan, T
    Bennett, J
    Common, A
    Vilos, G
    Kung, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2003, 10 (01): : 99 - 106
  • [8] Pelvic sepsis complicating embolization of a uterine fibroid
    Robson, S
    Wilson, K
    Munday, D
    Sebben, R
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (04) : 516 - 517
  • [9] Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas
    Spies, JB
    Spector, A
    Roth, AR
    Baker, CM
    Mauro, L
    Murphy-Skrynarz, K
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (05) : 873 - 880
  • [10] Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolisation
    Vashisht, A
    Studd, J
    Carey, A
    Burn, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9175) : 307 - 308