Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: Impact of radiographic spatial anatomy

被引:98
作者
Elbahnasy, AM
Clayman, RV
Shalhav, AL
Hoenig, DM
Chandhoke, P
Lingeman, JE
Denstedt, JD
Kahn, R
Assimos, DG
Nakada, SY
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Urol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Div Urol, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Methodist Hosp Indiana, Kidney Stone Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Div Urol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[5] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Div Urol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.1998.12.113
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spatial anatomy of the lower renal pole, as defined by the infundibulopelvic angle (LIP angle), infundibular length (IL), and infundibular width (IW), plays a significant role in the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy, A wide LIP angle, a short IL, and a broad IW, individually or in combination, favor stone clearance, whereas a LIP <70 degrees, an IL >3 cm, or an IW less than or equal to 5 mm are individually unfavorable, When all three unfavorable factors or an unfavorable LIP and IL coexist, the post-SWL stone-free rate falls to 50% or less. Using these criteria, more than one fourth of our patients with a lower-pole calculus might have been better served by an initial percutaneous or perhaps ureteroscopic procedure, neither of which is significantly affected by the lower-pole spatial anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bagley D H, 1987, Surg Endosc, V1, P119, DOI 10.1007/BF00312699
[2]  
Clayman RV., 1989, SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIP, V2, P403
[3]   COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC AND RADIOLOGICAL RESIDUAL FRAGMENT RATE FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY [J].
DENSTEDT, JD ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
PICUS, DD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04) :703-705
[4]   Intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral and renal calculi using small caliber (1.9F) electrohydraulic lithotripsy probes [J].
Elashry, OM ;
DiMeglio, RB ;
Nakada, SY ;
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1581-1585
[5]  
ELBAHNASY AM, 1997, J UROLOGY, V157, pA422
[6]   LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IN 1,003 EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY PATIENTS [J].
GRAFF, J ;
DIEDERICHS, W ;
SCHULZE, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 140 (03) :479-483
[7]   Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite [J].
Grasso, M .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) :199-206
[8]   DETAILED CALICEAL ANATOMY FOR ENDOUROLOGY [J].
KAYE, KW ;
REINKE, DB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 132 (06) :1085-1088
[9]   RENAL ANATOMY FOR ENDOUROLOGIC STONE REMOVAL [J].
KAYE, KW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (04) :647-648
[10]   EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND RESIDUAL STONE FRAGMENTS IN LOWER CALICES [J].
MCCULLOUGH, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (01) :140-140