Soil and total ecosystem respiration in agricultural fields: effect of soil and crop type

被引:143
作者
Lohila, A
Aurela, M
Regina, K
Laurila, T
机构
[1] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki 00810, Finland
[2] Agrifood Res Finland, MTT, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
mineral soil; peat soil; soil carbon content; soil respiration; total ecosystem respiration;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023004205844
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A study was made of the effect of soil and crop type on the soil and total ecosystem respiration rates in agricultural soils in southern Finland. The main interest was to compare the soil respiration rates in peat and two different mineral soils growing barley, grass and potato. Respiration measurements were conducted during the growing season with (1) a closed-dynamic ecosystem respiration chamber, in which combined plant and soil respiration was measured and ( 2) a closed-dynamic soil respiration chamber which measured only the soil and root-derived respiration. A semi-empirical model including separate functions for the soil and plant respiration components was used for the total ecosystem respiration (TER), and the resulting soil respiration parameters for different soil and crop types were compared. Both methods showed that the soil respiration in the peat soil was 2-3 times as high as that in the mineral soils, varying from 0.11 to 0.36 mg (CO2) m(-2) s(-1) in the peat soil and from 0.02 to 0.17 mg (CO2) m(-2) s(-1) in the mineral soils. The difference between the soil types was mainly attributed to the soil organic C content, which in the uppermost 20 cm of the peat soil was 24 kg m(-2), being about 4 times as high as that in the mineral soils. Depending on the measurement method, the soil respiration in the sandy soil was slightly higher than or similar to that in the clay soil. In each soil type, the soil respiration was highest on the grass plots. Higher soil respiration parameter values (R-s0, describing the soil respiration at a soil temperature of 10degreesC, and obtained by modelling) were found on the barley than on the potato plots. The difference was explained by the different cultivation history of the plots, as the potato plots had lain fallow during the preceding summer. The total ecosystem respiration followed the seasonal evolution in the leaf area and measured photosynthetic flux rates. The 2-3-fold peat soil respiration term as compared to mineral soil indicates that the cultivated peat soil ecosystem is a strong net CO2 source.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 317
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Effects of soil temperature and moisture on soil respiration in barley and fallow plots [J].
Akinremi, OO ;
McGinn, SM ;
McLean, HDJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1999, 79 (01) :5-13
[2]   Reconstruction of the carbon balance for microsites in a boreal oligotrophic pine fen, Finland [J].
Alm, J ;
Talanov, A ;
Saarnio, S ;
Silvola, J ;
Ikkonen, E ;
Aaltonen, H ;
Nykanen, H ;
Martikainen, PJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 110 (03) :423-431
[3]  
Alm J, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P161, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0161:CBOABB]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Separation of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) [J].
Andrews, JA ;
Harrison, KG ;
Matamala, R ;
Schlesinger, WH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (05) :1429-1435
[6]   Carbon dioxide exchange in a subarctic peatland ecosystem in northern Europe measured by the eddy covariance technique [J].
Aurela, M ;
Tuovinen, JP ;
Laurila, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D10) :11289-11301
[7]   Seasonal CO2 balances of a subarctic mire [J].
Aurela, M ;
Laurila, T ;
Tuovinen, JP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D2) :1623-1637
[8]   Net CO2 exchange of a subarctic mountain birch ecosystem [J].
Aurela, M ;
Tuovinen, JP ;
Laurila, T .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2001, 70 (1-4) :135-148
[9]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MASS AND ENERGY-EXCHANGE RATES OVER A CLOSED C-3 (WHEAT) AND AN OPEN C-4 (CORN) CROP .2. CO2 EXCHANGE AND WATER-USE EFFICIENCY [J].
BALDOCCHI, D .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1994, 67 (3-4) :291-321
[10]  
Blake G. R., 1986, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, P363