Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation

被引:47
作者
Dolce, C
Van Sickels, JE
Bays, RA
Rugh, JD
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Orthodont, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Surg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthodont, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/joms.2000.16617
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study examined the stability of skeletal changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation up to 2 years postoperatively. Patients and Methods: Subjects for this multisite, prospective, clinical trial received rigid (n = 78) or wire (n = 49) fixation. The rigid cases were fixed with three 2-mm bicortical position screws and 1 to 2 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with elastics, and the wire fixation subjects were fixed with inferior border wires and had 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before orthodontics, immediately before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Results: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior sagittal advancement of the mandibular symphysis was 4.92 +/- 3.01 mm in the rigid group and 5.11 +/- 3.09 mm in the wire group, and the inferior vertical displacement was 3.37 +/- 2.44 in the rigid group and 2.85 +/- 1.78 in the wire group. The vertical changes were similar in both groups. Two years postsurgery, the wire group had 30% sagittal relapse of the mandibular symphysis, whereas there was no change in the rigid group (P < .001). Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. Conclusions: Rigid fixation is a more stable method than wire fixation for maintaining mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. (C) 2000 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1227
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[2]  
Ayoub A F, 1994, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V9, P257
[3]   STABILITY OF MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT OSTEOTOMY USING RIGID INTERNAL-FIXATION [J].
BARER, PG ;
WALLEN, TR ;
MCNEILL, RW ;
REITZIK, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 92 (05) :403-411
[4]  
BEHRMAN SJ, 1972, J ORAL SURG, V30, P554
[5]  
Bjork A, 1977, Br J Orthod, V4, P53
[6]  
BJORK A, 1969, AM J ORTHOD, V60, P111
[7]   RECOVERY OF MANDIBULAR MOBILITY FOLLOWING ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY [J].
BOYD, SB ;
KARAS, ND ;
SINN, DP .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (09) :924-931
[8]   STABILITY OF MANDIBULAR LENGTHENING USING BICORTICAL SCREW FIXATION [J].
CASKEY, RT ;
TURPIN, DL ;
BLOOMQUIST, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 96 (04) :320-326
[9]   STABILITY AFTER REOPERATION FOR PROGRESSIVE CONDYLAR RESORPTION AFTER ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY - REPORT OF 7 CASES [J].
CRAWFORD, JG ;
STOELINGA, PJW ;
BLIJDORP, PA ;
BROUNS, JJA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (05) :460-466
[10]   MECHANISMS OF EARLY SKELETAL RELAPSE FOLLOWING SURGICAL ADVANCEMENT OF THE MANDIBLE [J].
EPKER, BN ;
WESSBERG, GA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1982, 20 (03) :175-182