Differences in the pathologic and molecular features of intraductal breast carcinoma between younger and older women

被引:43
作者
Rodrigues, NA
Dillon, D
Carter, D
Parisot, N
Haffty, BG
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Therapeut Radiol, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); molecular markers; HER-2/neu; young age; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.11204
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at a young age appear to have a different natural history and biology, including a higher local relapse rate, than patients diagnosed later in life. The current study compared various pathologic and molecular features of DCIS arising in a cohort of young women with those of DCIS arising in a cohort of older women to identify potential biologic differences between these two populations of patients. METHODS. The study population consisted of 20 patients age < 42 years and 34 patients age > 60 years who were treated at Yale University School of Medicine with breast-conserving therapy (FICT) and whose archival paraffin blocks were available and had sufficient tumor for staining. The original slides from each case were reviewed and the most representative specimen block from each case was processed for immunohistochemical staining. Pathologic characteristics evaluated for each case included histology, grade, and presence of necrosis. Paraffin-embedded sections were immunohistochemically evaluated for expression of HER-2/neu, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), bcl-2, cyclin D1, Ki-67, and p53. RESULTS. Although there was no difference in pathologic features of the tumors between the two groups, HER-2/neu was found to be overexpressed in a greater percentage of the younger population (P = 0.06). There was no apparent difference in expression of the other markers. Of note, HER-2/neu expression was correlated with high nuclear grade (P = 0.004), necrosis (P = 0.06), and ER and PR negativity (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively) in the combined population. CONCLUSIONS. The current study data suggested that HER-2/neu overexpression in younger patients may characterize a biologic difference in their tumor and may partially contribute to their higher risk of recurrence. Further studies are needed to assess whether this difference holds independent of grade and to evaluate the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu overexpression in DCIS. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1403
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   THE RELATION BETWEEN SURVIVAL AND AGE AT DIAGNOSIS IN BREAST-CANCER [J].
ADAMI, HO ;
MALKER, B ;
HOLMBERG, L ;
PERSSON, I ;
STONE, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (09) :559-563
[2]   OVEREXPRESSION OF HER-2 NEU AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CHANGE DURING THE PROGRESSION OF INSITU TO INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
ALLRED, DC ;
CLARK, GM ;
MOLINA, R ;
TANDON, AK ;
SCHNITT, SJ ;
GILCHRIST, KW ;
OSBORNE, CK ;
TORMEY, DC ;
MCGUIRE, WL .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (09) :974-979
[3]   IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF C-ERBB-2-PROTEIN IN MAMMARY DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU [J].
BARTKOVA, J ;
BARNES, DM ;
MILLIS, RR ;
GULLICK, WJ .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1990, 21 (11) :1164-1167
[4]   Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: Coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53 [J].
Beenken, SW ;
Grizzle, WE ;
Crowe, DR ;
Conner, MG ;
Weiss, HL ;
Sellers, MT ;
Krontiras, H ;
Urist, MM ;
Bland, KI .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (05) :630-637
[5]   Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: Analysis of European organization for research and treatment of cancer trial 10853 [J].
Bijker, N ;
Peterse, JL ;
Duchateau, L ;
Julien, JP ;
Fentiman, IS ;
Duval, C ;
Di Palma, S ;
Simony-Lafontaine, J ;
de Mascarel, I ;
van de Vijver, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) :2263-2271
[6]  
BOBROW LG, 1994, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V11, P199
[7]   AGE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN BREAST-CANCER - RELATIONSHIP TO PATHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGIC FEATURES [J].
BONNIER, P ;
ROMAIN, S ;
CHARPIN, C ;
LEJEUNE, C ;
TUBIANA, N ;
MARTIN, PM ;
PIANA, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 62 (02) :138-144
[8]  
BUR ME, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V69, P1174
[9]  
Chung M, 1996, CANCER, V77, P97, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<97::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-3