Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets

被引:55
作者
Jones, IL [1 ]
Hunter, FM [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Biol, St John, NF A1B 3X9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Aethia pusilla; Alcinae; auklet; feather ornament; Fisherian runaway; mate choice; sensory exploitation; sexual selection; species recognition; viability indicator;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/9.2.187
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Auklets (Alcidae, Aethiini) include five species of small, socially monogamous, sexually monomorphic seabirds that display a variety of feather and bare-part ornaments during the breeding season. Previous experimental work on two auklet species has demonstrated that some ornaments are likely to be favored by sexual selection because mutual male and female mating preferences benefit individuals with the most elaborate expression of these traits. In this study we experimentally investigated whether naturally crestless least auklets Aethia pusilla have a mating preference for forehead crests similar to the most prominent ornament of two other species, crested A. cristatella and whiskered auklets A. pygmaea. Our objective was to investigate the function of this ornament as a species-recognition mechanism or as a product of one or more of three proposed sexual selection models that address the origin of elaborate traits and preferences. During the experiment, least auklets reacted to realistic models equipped with artificial forehead crests with approximately an order of magnitude more frequent sexual displays and greater interest, consistent with the idea that they have a mating preference for crests, even though they do not naturally express this ornament. This heterospecific preference also favored large crest size. These results refute the possibility that least auklet forehead ornamentation alone determines species recognition at present. Among models of sexual selection considered, the results are consistent with the sensory exploitation model, although this could not be established unequivocally because a viability indicator or Fisherian mechanism could have been involved if least auklets had an ancestor with a forehead crest.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON M, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
[2]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[3]   AERODYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF LONG TAILS IN BIRDS [J].
BALMFORD, A ;
THOMAS, ALR ;
JONES, IL .
NATURE, 1993, 361 (6413) :628-631
[4]  
BALMFORD A, 1992, NATURE, V359, P487, DOI 10.1038/359487a0
[5]   TESTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF SEXUAL SELECTION THROUGH FEMALE CHOICE [J].
BALMFORD, A ;
READ, AF .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1991, 6 (09) :274-276
[6]   MALE TAIL LENGTH, SEXUAL DISPLAY INTENSITY AND FEMALE SEXUAL-RESPONSE IN A PARASITIC AFRICAN FINCH [J].
BARNARD, P .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1990, 39 :652-656
[7]   FEMALE PREFERENCE PREDATES THE EVOLUTION OF THE SWORD IN SWORDTAIL FISH [J].
BASOLO, AL .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4982) :808-810
[8]  
Burley N., 1981, P121
[9]   SEXUAL SELECTION FOR AESTHETIC TRAITS IN SPECIES WITH BIPARENTAL CARE [J].
BURLEY, N .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1986, 127 (04) :415-445
[10]  
BYRD GV, 1986, ARCTIC, V39, P109