Economic valuation of informal care: the contingent valuation method applied to informal caregiving

被引:73
作者
van den Berg, B
Brouwer, W
van Exel, J
Koopmanschap, M
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, iBMG, iMTA, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, PZO, Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
informal care; contingent valuation; economic evaluation; willingness to accept;
D O I
10.1002/hec.893
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reports the results of the application of the contingent valuation method (CVM) to determine a monetary value of informal care. We discuss the current practice in valuing informal care and a theoretical model of the costs and benefits related to the provision of informal care. In addition, we developed a survey in which informal caregivers' willingness to accept (WTA) to provide an additional hour of informal care was elicited. This method is better than normally recommended valuation methods able to capture the heterogeneity and dynamics of informal care. Data were obtained from postal surveys. A total of 153 informal caregivers and 149 care recipients with rheumatoid arthritis returned a completed survey. Informal caregivers reported a mean WTA to provide a hypothetical additional hour of informal care of 9.52 Euro (n = 124). Many hypotheses derived from the theoretical model and the literature were supported by the data. CVM is a promising alternative for existing methods like the opportunity cost method and the proxy good method to determine a monetary value of informal care that can be incorporated in the numerator of any economic evaluation. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 183
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[2]  
BAARSMA B, 2000, MONETARY VALUATION E, V302
[3]   Measuring the value of time for methadone maintenance clients: willingness to pay, willingness to accept, and the wage rate [J].
Borisova, NN ;
Goodman, AC .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (04) :323-334
[4]   PROPERTY-RIGHTS AND NATURAL-RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS [J].
BROMLEY, DW .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) :129-135
[5]   The valuation of informal care in economic appraisal - A consideration of individual choice and societal costs of time [J].
Brouwer, WBF ;
van Exel, NJA ;
Koopmanschap, MA ;
Rutten, FFH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (01) :147-160
[6]   Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters [J].
Brown, TC ;
Gregory, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (03) :323-335
[7]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[8]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210
[9]  
CARSON RT, 1997, DETERMINGING VALUE N
[10]  
Diener A, 1998, HEALTH ECON, V7, P313, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<313::AID-HEC350>3.0.CO