Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole 15-and 30-mg sachets for suspension versus intact capsules

被引:7
作者
Amer, F
Karol, MD
Pan, WJ
Griffin, JS
Lukasik, NL
Locke, CS
Chiu, YL
机构
[1] TAP Pharmaceut Prod Inc, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA
[2] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
关键词
pharmacokinetics; proton pump inhibitor; lansoprazole capsule; lansoprazole sachet for suspension; alternative dosage formulations;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.008
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: The pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of lansoprazole 15- and 30-mg sachets for suspension were compared with those of corresponding doses of lansoprazole oral capsules. Methods: Healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) into 2 Phase 1, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period complete crossover studies. in the first study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 15-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 15-mg oral capsule; in the second study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 30-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 30-mg oral capsule. Administration of the 2 formulations was separated by a washout period of greater than or equal to7 days. Blood samples were collected before and after each administration to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole and bioequivalence between suspension and capsule. Results: Thirty-six subjects (19 males, 17 females) with a mean (SD) age of 32.0 (9.6) years and mean (SD) body weight of 68.6 (10.5) kg received lansoprazole 15 mg. Thirty-six subjects (22 males, 14 females) with a mean (SD) age of 38.0 (8.3) years and mean (SD) body weight of 75.1 (9.7) kg received lansoprazole 30 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension were similar to those of the corresponding doses of the oral capsules. The mean (SD) values for C-max and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) for the lansoprazole 15-mg sachet (591.9 [242.3] ng/mL and 1614 [2065] ng(.)h/mL, respectively) did not differ significantly from those for the lansoprazole 15-mg capsules (578.6 [275.2] ng/mL and 1620 [2290] ng(.)h/mL, respectively). These parameters also did not differ significantly between the lansoprazole 30-mg sachet and 30-mg capsule: mean (SD) C-max, 1103 (428.3) and 1077 (465.6) ng/mL, respectively; mean (SD) AUC(0-infinity) 2655 (1338) and 2669 (1311) ng.h/mL, respectively. The 90% CIs for C-max and AUC(0-infinity) ratios were contained within the 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence range, supporting bioequivalence. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension are bioequivalent to the corresponding doses of oral capsules. The sachet for suspension may provide an alternative route of administration to patients who have difficulty swallowing solid oral formulations. (Clin Ther. 2004;26: 2076-2083) Copyright (C) 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2076 / 2083
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Review article:: uninvestigated dyspepsia and non-ulcer dyspepsia -: the use of endoscopy and the roles of Helicobacter pylori eradication and antisecretory therapy [J].
Chey, WD ;
Moayyedi, P .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 :1-8
[2]   Lansoprazole: Administration of the contents of a capsule dosage formulation through a nasogastric tube [J].
Chun, AHC ;
Shi, HH ;
Achari, R ;
Dennis, S ;
Cavanaugh, JH .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (05) :833-842
[3]   Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lansopraxole oral capsules and suspension in healthy subjects [J].
Doan, TT ;
Wang, Q ;
Griffin, JS ;
Lukasik, NL ;
O'Dea, RF ;
Pan, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2001, 58 (16) :1512-1519
[4]   Effects on 24-hour intragastric pH:: A comparison of lansoprazole administered nasogastrically in apple juice and pantoprazole administered intravenously [J].
Freston, J ;
Chiu, YL ;
Pan, WJ ;
Lukasik, N ;
Täubel, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (07) :2058-2065
[5]   Review article: approaches to the long-term management of adults with GERD-proton pump inhibitor therapy, laparoscopic fundoplication or endoscopic therapy? [J].
Freston, JW ;
Triadafilopoulos, G .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 :35-42
[6]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF OMEPRAZOLE FOR SEVERE GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN [J].
GUNASEKARAN, TS ;
HASSALL, EG .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1993, 123 (01) :148-154
[7]   Review article:: management of peptic ulcer bleeding -: the roles of proton pump inhibitors and Helicobacter pylori eradication [J].
Holtmann, G ;
Howden, CW .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 :66-70
[8]   Review article: appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 selective inhibitors [J].
Kimmey, MB ;
Lanas, A .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 :60-65
[9]   ESTIMATION OF VARIANCE FOR HARMONIC MEAN HALF-LIVES [J].
LAM, FC ;
HUNG, CT ;
PERRIER, DG .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 74 (02) :229-231
[10]  
*MDS PHARM SERV, 1999, METH QUANT LANS HUM