Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology - A review

被引:188
作者
Peters, FT [1 ]
Maurer, HH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Inst Expt & Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Dept Expt & Clin Toxicol, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
关键词
method; validation; bioanalysis; toxicology;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-002-0516-5
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The reliability of analytical data is very important to forensic and clinical toxicologists for the correct interpretation of toxicological findings. This makes (bio)analytical method validation an integral part of quality management and accreditation in analytical toxicology. Therefore, consensus should be reached in this field on the kind and extent of validation experiments as well as on acceptance criteria for validation parameters. In this review, the most important papers published on this topic since 1991 have been reviewed. Terminology, theoretical and practical aspects as well as implications for forensic and clinical toxicology of the following validation parameters are discussed: selectivity (specificity), calibration model (linearity), accuracy, precision, limits, stability, recovery and ruggedness (robustness).
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 449
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EV PREC PERF CLIN CH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Guidance for industry, bioanalytical method validation
[3]   Validation of liquid chromatographic and gas chromatographic methods - Applications to pharmacokinetics [J].
Bressolle, F ;
BrometPetit, M ;
Audran, M .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 686 (01) :3-10
[4]   Validation of chromatographic methods in biomedical analysis - Viewpoint and discussion [J].
Causon, R .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1997, 689 (01) :175-180
[5]   APPLICATION ISSUES IN BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION, SAMPLE ANALYSIS AND DATA REPORTING [J].
DADGAR, D ;
BURNETT, PE ;
CHOC, MG ;
GALLICANO, K ;
HOOPER, JW .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 13 (02) :89-97
[6]   Issues in evaluation of bioanalytical method selectivity and drug stability [J].
Dadgar, D ;
Burnett, PE .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 14 (1-2) :23-31
[7]  
*EURACHEM CITAC, 2000, QUANT UNC AN MEAS
[8]   AN ANALYSIS OF THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE REPORT ON BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION [J].
HARTMANN, C ;
MASSART, DL ;
MCDOWALL, RD .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1994, 12 (11) :1337-1343
[9]   Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods [J].
Hartmann, C ;
Smeyers-Verbeke, J ;
Massart, DL ;
McDowall, RD .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 17 (02) :193-218
[10]  
*ICH, 1996, VAL AN METH METH