Suppression of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias -: results of the SOPAT trial

被引:94
作者
Patten, M [1 ]
Mass, R
Bauer, P
Lüderitz, B
Sonntag, F
Dluzniewski, M
Hatala, R
Opolski, G
Müller, HW
Meinertz, T
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Klinikum Eppendorf, Herzzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Vienna, Inst Med Stat, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Klinikum Bonn, Med Klin & Poliklin 2, Bonn, Germany
[4] Med Univ Warsaw, Brodnowski Hosp, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Slovak Cardiovasc Inst, Bratislava, Slovakia
[6] Cent Hosp, Warsaw, Poland
[7] Abbott GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
event recorder; antiarrhythmics; atrial fibrillation quinidine; verapamil; sotalol;
D O I
10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim The indication to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is controversial. The Suppression of Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (SOPAT) trial was designed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the average rate of spontaneous events of symptomatic PAF with and without anti-arrhythmic medication? (2) what is the prevalence of severe side-effects? and (3) is the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil inferior to the efficacy of sotalol or not? Methods and results Within 60 months 172 centres in Germany, Poland, and The Slovak Republic prospectively enrolled 1033 patients (mean age 60 years, 62% mate) with documented frequent episodes of symptomatic PAF. Patients were randomised to either Quinidine+Verapamil 480/240 mg/d (high dose; 263 patients), Quinidine+Verapamil 320/160 mg/d (tow dose; 255 patients), Sotalol 320 mg/d (264 patients) or placebo (251 patients), of which 1012 patients entered the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint was the time to first recurrence of symptomatic PAF or premature discontinuation. Secondary outcome parameters were the total number of symptomatic episodes and tolerability of the tested drugs. Patients were followed for a period of up to 12 months by daily and symptom-triggered trans-telephonic ECG-monitoring (Tele-ECG). The meantime under treatment was 233 152 days. Regarding the primary endpoint, all active treatments were superior to placebo and not different from each other.A total of 756 patients reached the primary endpoint within 105.7 +/- 8.7d (mean +/- SEM) in the placebo group, vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (150.4 +/- 10 d, p = 0.0061), vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (tow dose) (148.9 +/- 10.6 d, p = 0.0006), vs. Sotalol (145.6 +/- 93 d, p = 0.0007). All three treatments were also effective in the reduction of AF burden (days with symptomatic AF [%] mean +/- SD, p vs. placebo): Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (3.4 +/- 12, p = 0.0001), Quinidine + Verapamil (low dose) (4.5 +/- 12.3, p = 0.008) and Sotalol (2.9 +/- 6.5, p = 0.026) compared to placebo (6.1 +/- 13.5). A total of four deaths, 13 syncopes, and one ventricular tachycardia, (VT) occurred during the active study period, of which one death and one VT were related to Quinidine/Verapamil. Conclusion Taken together, anti-arrhythmic therapy with the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil is as effective as Sotalol in the reduction of the recurrence rate of symptomatic PAF with a low but definite risk of severe side-effects. (C) 2004 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1404
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF QUINIDINE THERAPY FOR MAINTENANCE OF SINUS RHYTHM AFTER CARDIOVERSION - A METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS
    COPLEN, SE
    ANTMAN, EM
    BERLIN, JA
    HEWITT, P
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) : 1106 - 1116
  • [2] VErapamil plus antiarrhythmic drugs reduce atrial fibrillation recurrences after an electrical cardioversion (VEPARAF study)
    De Simone, A
    De Pasquale, M
    De Matteis, C
    Canciello, M
    Manzo, M
    Sabino, L
    Alfano, F
    Di Mauro, M
    Campana, A
    De Fabrizio, G
    Vitale, DF
    Turco, P
    Stabile, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (15) : 1425 - 1429
  • [3] Quality of life improves with treatment in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation
    Dorian, P
    Paquette, M
    Newman, D
    Green, M
    Connolly, SJ
    Talajic, M
    Roy, D
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 143 (06) : 984 - 990
  • [4] Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion: results of the PAFAC trial
    Fetsch, T
    Bauer, P
    Engberding, R
    Koch, HP
    Lukl, J
    Meinertzf, T
    Oeff, M
    Seipel, L
    Trappe, HJ
    Treese, N
    Breithardt, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (16) : 1385 - 1394
  • [5] ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUG-THERAPY AND CARDIAC MORTALITY IN ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
    FLAKER, GC
    BLACKSHEAR, JL
    MCBRIDE, R
    KRONMAL, RA
    HALPERIN, JL
    HART, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (03) : 527 - 532
  • [6] HEILMANN E, 1972, Medizinische Welt, V23, P1792
  • [7] Effectiveness of verapamil-quinidine versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Innes, GD
    Vertesi, L
    Dillon, EC
    Metcalfe, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 29 (01) : 126 - 134
  • [8] MAURER W, 1995, MULTIPLE COMP DRUG T
  • [9] QUINIDINE-RELATED MORTALITY IN THE SHORT-TO-MEDIUM-TERM TREATMENT OF VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS - A METAANALYSIS
    MORGANROTH, J
    GOIN, JE
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (05) : 1977 - 1983
  • [10] Patten M, 1999, Z KARDIOL, V88, P185, DOI 10.1007/s003920050275