Breaks during 5 Hz rTMS are essential for facilitatory after effects

被引:68
作者
Rothkegel, H. [1 ]
Sommer, M. [1 ]
Paulus, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Current direction; Neuroplasticity; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; THETA-BURST-STIMULATION; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; INHIBITION; PLASTICITY; METAPLASTICITY; DEPRESSION; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Stimulation frequency has been considered the most important factor in conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for determining the direction of after effects on corticospinal excitability. Here, we examined the functional relevance of breaks during high-frequency subthreshold rTMS for the induction of facilitatory after effects. Methods: The after effects on corticospinal excitability of a standard 5 Hz rTMS protocol in a block design were compared to a continuous rTMS protocol using the same number of pulses. In addition the effect of current direction both for rTMS and single pulse TMS was included in the study design. Results: While 5 Hz rTMS in a standard block design induces facilitatory after effects on corticospinal excitability, the continuous protocol does not induce facilitation but rather inhibition. In our study only rTMS using an initially posterior-anterior current direction in the brain leads to significant neuroplastic effects at all. Conclusions: Breaks during conventional high-frequency rTMS are a crucial factor determining the direction of induced neuroplastic changes. Significance: These results contribute to the understanding of rTMS-induced neuroplasticity and are important for the design of rTMS protocols both for experimental and clinical studies. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 430
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Terney, Daniella ;
Poreisz, Csaba ;
Paulus, Walter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 26 (09) :2687-2691
[2]   Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Chen, R ;
Classen, J ;
Gerloff, C ;
Celnik, P ;
Wassermann, EM ;
Hallett, M ;
Cohen, LG .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) :1398-1403
[3]   The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex [J].
Di Lazzaro, V. ;
Pilato, F. ;
Dileone, M. ;
Profice, P. ;
Oliviero, A. ;
Mazzone, P. ;
Insola, A. ;
Ranieri, F. ;
Meglio, M. ;
Tonali, P. A. ;
Rothwell, J. C. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2008, 586 (16) :3871-3879
[4]   Short-term reduction of intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Di Lazzaro, V ;
Oliviero, A ;
Mazzone, P ;
Pilato, F ;
Saturno, E ;
Dileone, M ;
Insola, A ;
Tonali, PA ;
Rothwell, JC .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 147 (01) :108-113
[5]  
Di Lazzaro V, 1998, EXP BRAIN RES, V119, P265
[6]  
Di Lazzaro V, 2001, EXP BRAIN RES, V141, P121
[7]   A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition [J].
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Fountain, Sarah ;
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (12) :2584-2596
[8]   The after effects of motor cortex rTMS depend on the state of contraction when rTMS is applied [J].
Fujiwara, T ;
Rothwell, JC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (07) :1514-1518
[9]   Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: Evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity [J].
Gentner, Reinhard ;
Wankerl, Katharina ;
Reinsberger, Claus ;
Zeller, Daniel ;
Classen, Joseph .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (09) :2046-2053
[10]   Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans [J].
Gorsler, A ;
Bäumer, T ;
Weiller, C ;
Münchau, A ;
Liepert, J .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (10) :1800-1807