Temporal patterns in the size of conservation land transactions

被引:27
作者
Davies, Zoe G. [1 ]
Kareiva, Peter [2 ]
Armsworth, Paul R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Biodivers & Macroecol Grp, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Santa Clara Univ Project Off, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2010年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Conservation easement; conservation planning; economics; fee simple acquisition; land trust; NGO; not-for-profit; protected areas; site selection; STATE-LEVEL VARIATION; RESERVE SELECTION; EASEMENTS; TRUSTS; INVESTMENT; PAYMENTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00091.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The full or partial acquisition of land remains a predominant focus of terrestrial conservation strategies. Non-governmental organizations play an important role in habitat protection, yet few studies investigate their contribution to conservation investment. Here we examine temporal trends in the size of land transactions made by the world's largest land trust, The Nature Conservancy (TNC). We consider three dimensions of deal size (area, upfront cost, and relative cost per hectare) for two commonly used conservation approaches (fee simple acquisitions and conservation easements). Mean area of protected land parcels has been robust to the growing subdivision of properties for sale. Variation in the area and cost of transactions ranged between six and eight orders of magnitude, and increased through time as TNC undertook occasional large deals once established. Conservation planning approaches need to better account for the variation in deal sizes, and how this may change in response to dynamic budgets and priorities.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Could state-level variation in the number of land trusts make economic sense? [J].
Albers, HJ ;
Ando, AW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (03) :311-327
[2]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Viable populations for conservation
[4]   The effectiveness of buying easements as a conservation strategy [J].
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Sanchirico, James N. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2008, 1 (04) :182-189
[5]   Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation [J].
Armsworth, PR ;
Daily, GC ;
Kareiva, P ;
Sanchirico, JN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (14) :5403-5408
[6]   When is a correlation between non-independent variables "spurious"? [J].
Brett, MT .
OIKOS, 2004, 105 (03) :647-656
[7]   Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000 [J].
Brown, DG ;
Johnson, KM ;
Loveland, TR ;
Theobald, DM .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (06) :1851-1863
[8]   DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY [J].
CAUGHLEY, G .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) :215-244
[9]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[10]  
DIAMOND J M, 1975, Biological Conservation, V7, P129, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90052-X