Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient

被引:97
作者
Lonneux, M
Lawson, G
Ide, C
Bausart, R
Remacle, M
Pauwels, S
机构
[1] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Brussels, Belgium
[2] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Brussels, Belgium
[3] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Mt Godinne Univ Hosp, Yvoir, Belgium
关键词
head and neck cancer; fluorodeoxyglucose; positron emission tomography; management;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200009000-00016
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the impact of positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in the treatment of patients suspected of having head and neck cancer recurrence. Study Design: Prospective and consecutive inclusion of 44 patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of head and neck tumor recurrence. Methods: FDG-PET was compared with combined computed tomography (CT) plus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures for the differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and benign post-therapeutic changes. For FDG-PET, the potential additional value of semiquantitative indexes was studied. The impact on patient treatment (i.e., their ability to accurately select patients for panendoscopic exploration) was analyzed retrospectively for both CT+MRI and PET workups. Results: The diagnostic accuracy was found higher for PET than for combined CT-MRI: sensitivity ranged from 96% to 73%, specificity from 61% to 50%, and accuracy from 81% to 64% for PET and CT+MRI, respectively. The accuracy of FDG-PET was the highest (94%) in patients included more than 12 weeks after the end of therapy. In 15 discordant cases, PET was correct in 11 and CT+MRI in 4. Patient selection for panendoscopic exploration and biopsy was correct in 79% and 50% of patients with FDG-PET and CT+MRI, respectively, Quantification of FDG uptake had no additional value over visual analysis alone, although we found that a SWlbm (standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass) threshold of 3 could be helpful in patients scanned less than 12 weeks after the end of therapy. Conclusion: FDG-PET has a major additional diagnostic value to CT+MRI for the evaluation of the symptomatic patient suspected of having head and neck cancer recurrence. PET could have a direct impact on management by correctly selecting patients in whom a panendoscopic exploration with biopsy is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1497
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Recurrence of head and neck cancer after surgery or irradiation: Prospective comparison of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose PET and MR imaging diagnoses [J].
Anzai, Y ;
Carroll, WR ;
Quint, DJ ;
Bradford, CR ;
Minoshima, S ;
Wolf, GT ;
Wahl, RL .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) :135-141
[2]   PILOT-STUDY OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER RECEIVING RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BERLANGIERI, SU ;
BRIZEL, DM ;
SCHER, RL ;
SCHIFTER, T ;
HAWK, TC ;
HAMBLEN, S ;
COLEMAN, RE ;
HOFFMAN, JM .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 1994, 16 (04) :340-346
[3]  
Cheon Gi Jeong, 1999, Clin Positron Imaging, V2, P197, DOI 10.1016/S1095-0397(99)00023-0
[4]   NECK NEOPLASMS - MR IMAGING .2. POSTTREATMENT EVALUATION [J].
GLAZER, HS ;
NIEMEYER, JH ;
BALFE, DM ;
HAYDEN, RE ;
EMAMI, B ;
DEVINENI, VR ;
LEVITT, RG ;
ARONBERG, DJ ;
WARD, MP ;
LEE, JKT ;
SAGEL, SS .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) :349-354
[5]  
GREVEN KM, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1355, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940815)74:4<1355::AID-CNCR2820740428>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-I
[7]   EXTRACRANIAL HEAD AND NECK - PET IMAGING WITH 2-[F-18]FLUORO-2-DEOXY-D-GLUCOSE AND MR IMAGING CORRELATION [J].
JABOUR, BA ;
CHOI, Y ;
HOH, CK ;
REGE, SD ;
SOONG, JC ;
LUFKIN, RB ;
HANAFEE, WN ;
MADDAHI, J ;
CHAIKEN, L ;
BAILET, J ;
PHELPS, ME ;
HAWKINS, RA ;
ABEMEYOR, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (01) :27-35
[8]  
KUBOTA R, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P1972
[9]   Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction [J].
Lonneux, M ;
Borbath, I ;
Bol, A ;
Coppens, A ;
Sibomana, M ;
Bausart, R ;
Defrise, M ;
Pauwels, S ;
Michel, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (06) :591-598
[10]  
LOWE VJ, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P1771