The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review

被引:667
作者
Nuti, Sudhakar V. [1 ]
Wayda, Brian [2 ]
Ranasinghe, Isuru [1 ]
Wang, Sisi [3 ]
Dreyer, Rachel P. [1 ]
Chen, Serene I. [2 ]
Murugiah, Karthik [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
INTERNET SEARCH TRENDS; ENGINE QUERY DATA; SEASONAL-VARIATION; SUICIDE DEATH; SURVEILLANCE; DISEASE; INFORMATION; INFECTION; BEHAVIOR; FLU;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. Methods and Findings: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic >= 0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. Conclusion: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Prediction of Dengue Incidence Using Search Query Surveillance [J].
Althouse, Benjamin M. ;
Ng, Yih Yng ;
Cummings, Derek A. T. .
PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2011, 5 (08)
[2]  
[Anonymous], CIT AV 2000 2010 FIE
[3]  
[Anonymous], TYP YOUR SEARCH TERM
[4]  
[Anonymous], NICOTINE TOB RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], J ANESTH CLIN RES
[6]  
[Anonymous], PLOS ONE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NATURE, DOI DOI 10.1038/nature07634
[8]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MULT SCLER INT, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/924029
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GOOGLE TRENDS