Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs

被引:662
作者
Zeng, S. X. [1 ]
Xie, X. M. [2 ]
Tam, C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Sch Management, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Sci & Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Innovation; Cooperation network; Innovation performance; SMEs; MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; INTERFIRM COOPERATION; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; COLLABORATION; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The complexity of innovation processes led to a tremendous growth in the use of external networks by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Based on a survey to 137 Chinese manufacturing SMEs, this paper empirically explores the relationships between different cooperation networks and innovation performance of SME using the technique of structural equation modeling (SEM). The study finds that there are significant positive relationships between inter-firm cooperation, cooperation with intermediary institutions, cooperation with research organizations and innovation performance of SMEs, of which inter-firm cooperation has the most significant positive impact on the innovation performance of SMEs. Surprisingly, the result reveals that the linkage and cooperation with government agencies do not demonstrate any significant impact on the innovation performance of SMEs. In addition, these findings confirm that the vertical and horizontal cooperation with customers, suppliers and other firms plays a more distinct role in the innovation process of SMEs than horizontal cooperation with research institutions, universities or colleges, and government agencies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 194
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey [J].
Amara, N ;
Landry, R .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (03) :245-259
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]   Science park, a high tech fantasy?: an analysis of the science parks of Greece [J].
Bakouros, YL ;
Mardas, DC ;
Varsakelis, NC .
TECHNOVATION, 2002, 22 (02) :123-128
[5]   R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J].
Becker, W ;
Dietz, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (02) :209-223
[6]   Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Diederen, B ;
Lokshin, B ;
Veugelers, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 22 (8-9) :1237-1263
[7]  
Bentler P.M., 1980, Psychological Bulletin, V88, P588, DOI DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[8]  
BERGMAN EM, 2008, ANN REGIONAL SCI
[9]   African SMES, networks, and manufacturing performance [J].
Biggs, Tyler ;
Shah, Manju Kedia .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (11) :3043-3066
[10]   From the industrial district to the district group: An insight into the evolution of local capitalism in Italy [J].
Brioschi, F ;
Brioschi, MS ;
Cainelli, G .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (09) :1037-1052