Response of developmental processes to temperature and photoperiod in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

被引:25
作者
Bertero, HD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, Dept Prod Vegetal, RA-1417 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
D O I
10.1081/FRI-120018870
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Experiments conducted under controlled environments and using nine quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars, the origin of which ranged from Colombia to southern Chile, demonstrated that all cultivars have a facultative short day response for duration of emergence to flowering. Furthermore, duration of all phases of development (emergence to floral initiation, floral initiation to first anthesis, and first anthesis to physiological maturity) is sensitive to photoperiod in this species. In experiments where two quinoa cultivars were subjected to constant photoperiods or were transferred between photoperiods at different phenological stages, it was shown that duration of a given phenological phase depended not only on duration of the photoperiod experienced by the genotype during this phase (immediate response) but was also affected by the duration of the photoperiod experienced during a previous phase (delayed response). Duration of the emergence-floral initiation phase was longer under a long photoperiod (14 h) compared to a short photoperiod (10.25 h), and this caused plants to initiate more leaf primordia under long days. Furthermore, long photoperiods applied during the floral initiation-anthesis phase affected duration of this phase and the proportion of leaf primordia developing into leaves. Seed growth was affected by photoperiod experienced after anthesis and also by preanthesis photoperiods. Inhibition of seed growth was strongest when long days were experienced in combination with high temperatures during seed growth.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Jones C. A., 1986, CERES MAIZE SIMULATI
[22]   Plant adaptation to temperature and photoperiod [J].
Junttila, O .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND, 1996, 5 (03) :251-260
[23]  
Kiniry J. R., 1991, PREDICTING CROP PHEN, P29
[24]   THE PHOTOPERIOD SENSITIVE INTERVAL IN MAIZE [J].
KINIRY, JR ;
RITCHIE, JT ;
MUSSER, RL ;
FLINT, EP ;
IWIG, WC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1983, 75 (04) :687-690
[25]   FACTORS AFFECTING RATE OF LEAF EMERGENCE IN BARLEY AND WHEAT [J].
KIRBY, EJM .
CROP SCIENCE, 1995, 35 (01) :11-19
[26]   TOWARDS THE RELIABLE PREDICTION OF TIME TO FLOWERING IN 6 ANNUAL CROPS .6. APPLICATIONS IN CROP IMPROVEMENT [J].
LAWN, RJ ;
SUMMERFIELD, RJ ;
ELLIS, RH ;
QI, A ;
ROBERTS, EH ;
CHAY, PM ;
BROUWER, JB ;
ROSE, JL ;
YEATES, SJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1995, 31 (01) :89-108
[27]  
MAJOR DJ, 1991, PREDICTING CROP PHEN, P233
[28]  
McMaster GS, 1997, ADV AGRON, V59, P63, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60053-X
[29]   ACCURACY OF EQUATIONS PREDICTING THE PHYLLOCHRON OF WHEAT [J].
MCMASTER, GS ;
WILHELM, WW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1995, 35 (01) :30-36
[30]  
MORSE R. N., 1962, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, V7, P128