Direct Democracy and Individual Interest Group Membership

被引:21
作者
Boehmke, Frederick J. [1 ]
Bowen, Daniel C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Coll New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628 USA
关键词
BALLOT INITIATIVES; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; AMERICAN STATES; VOTER TURNOUT; DIVERSITY; INSTITUTIONS; GEOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1017/S0022381610000083
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Direct democracy has been shown to increase the number and diversity of interest groups in American states, but no research has extended this finding to the individual level. Direct democracy may influence individual joining behavior through three distinct processes: first, by affecting the interest group population in a state, direct democracy should increase opportunity for joining. Second, direct democracy opens new policy areas for representation, which may increase the scope and level of political conflict and draw in new participants. Third, by providing more opportunities for involvement in policymaking, direct democracy may create a more engaged citizenry, spurring the joining of groups. We utilize data from the pooled General Social Survey merged with state-level measures of the presence and use of the initiative process. Using multilevel modeling to test the initiative's effect on individual joining behavior, we find that the initiative does indeed foster greater levels of group membership.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 671
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland [J].
Benz, M ;
Stutzer, A .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2004, 119 (1-2) :31-59
[2]   Using auxiliary data to estimate selection bias models, with an application to interest group use of the direct initiative process [J].
Boehmke, FJ .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (03) :234-254
[3]   The effect of direct democracy on the size and diversity of state interest group populations [J].
Boehmke, FJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2002, 64 (03) :827-844
[4]  
Boehmke Frederick., 2007, Economics Politics, V19, P97
[5]   The Initiative Process and the Dynamics of State Interest Group Populations [J].
Boehmke, Frederick J. .
STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2008, 8 (04) :362-383
[6]  
Boehmke FrederickJ., 2005, POLIT RES QUART, V58, P575
[7]  
Boehmke FrederickJ., 2005, The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation: How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems
[8]   Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government [J].
Bowler, S ;
Donovan, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :371-390
[9]   Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data [J].
Brace, P ;
Sims-Butler, K ;
Arceneaux, K ;
Johnson, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 46 (01) :173-189
[10]  
Cronin ThomasE., 1989, Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall