"Listen to the People": Public Deliberation About Social Distancing Measures in a Pandemic

被引:84
作者
Baum, Nancy M. [1 ]
Jacobson, Peter D. [1 ]
Goold, Susan D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
health policy; population; public health; HEALTH ETHICS; INFLUENZA;
D O I
10.1080/15265160903197531
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Public engagement in ethically laden pandemic planning decisions may be important for transparency, creating public trust, improving compliance with public health orders, and ultimately, contributing to just outcomes. We conducted focus groups with members of the public to characterize public perceptions about social distancing measures likely to be implemented during a pandemic. Participants expressed concerns about job security and economic strain on families if businesses or school closures are prolonged. They shared opposition to closure of religious organizations, citing the need for shared support and worship during times of crises. Group discussions elicited evidence of community-mindedness (e.g., recognition of an extant duty not to infect others), while some also acknowledged strong self-interest. Participants conveyed desire for opportunities for public input and education, and articulated distrust of government. Social distancing measures may be challenging to implement and sustain due to strains on family resources and lack of trust in government.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 14
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting [J].
Abelson, J ;
Eyles, J ;
McLeod, CB ;
Collins, P ;
McMullan, C ;
Forest, PG .
HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 66 (01) :95-106
[2]   Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes [J].
Abelson, J ;
Forest, PG ;
Eyles, J ;
Smith, P ;
Martin, E ;
Gauvin, FP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) :239-251
[3]   Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base [J].
Aledort, Julia E. ;
Lurie, Nicole ;
Wasserman, Jeffrey ;
Bozzette, Samuel A. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STAND GUARD THEE ETH
[5]   The current status of planning for pandemic influenza and implications for health care planning in the United States [J].
Bartlett, John G. ;
Borio, Luciana .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (06) :919-925
[6]   Looking ahead: Addressing ethical challenges in public health practice [J].
Baum, Nancy M. ;
Gollust, Sarah E. ;
Goold, Susan D. ;
Jacobson, Peter D. .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2007, 35 (04) :657-+
[7]   The genesis of public health ethics [J].
Bayer, R ;
Fairchild, AL .
BIOETHICS, 2004, 18 (06) :473-492
[8]  
Bell D, 2006, EMERG INFECT DIS, V12, P81
[9]  
BLENDON R, 2006, EMERG INFECT DIS, V14, P778
[10]   Ethics and public health: Forging a strong relationship [J].
Callahan, D ;
Jennings, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (02) :169-176