Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system

被引:120
作者
Ma, CM [1 ]
Pawlicki, T [1 ]
Jiang, SB [1 ]
Li, JS [1 ]
Deng, J [1 ]
Mok, E [1 ]
Kapur, A [1 ]
Xing, L [1 ]
Ma, L [1 ]
Boyer, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/45/9/303
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to use Monte Carlo simulations to verify the accuracy of the dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system (Corvus, Nomos Corp., Sewickley, PA) for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A Monte Carlo treatment planning system has been implemented clinically to improve and verify the accuracy of radiotherapy dose calculations. Further modifications to the system were made to compute the dose in a patient for multiple fixed-gantry IMRT fields. The dose distributions in the experimental phantoms and in the patients were calculated and used to verify the optimized treatment plans generated by the Corvus system. The Monte Carlo calculated IMRT dose distributions agreed with the measurements to within 2% of the maximum dose for all the beam energies and field sizes for both the homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. The dose distributions predicted by the Corvus system, which employs a finite-size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithm, agreed with the Monte Carlo simulations and measurements to within 4% in a cylindrical water phantom with various hypothetical target shapes. Discrepancies of more than 5% (relative to the prescribed target dose) in the target region and over 20% in the critical structures were found in some IMRT patient calculations. The FSPB algorithm as implemented in the Corvus system is adequate for homogeneous phantoms (such as prostate) but may result in significant under- or over-estimation of the dose in some cases involving heterogeneities such as the air-tissue, lung-tissue and tissue-bone interfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:2483 / 2495
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MED PHYS, V10, P741
[2]  
Bielajew A., 1990, The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation, Volume, P427
[3]  
BOESECKE R, 1988, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V164, P151
[4]   Theoretical considerations of monitor unit calculations for intensity modulated beam treatment planning [J].
Boyer, A ;
Xing, L ;
Ma, CM ;
Curran, B ;
Hill, R ;
Kania, A ;
Bleier, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) :187-195
[5]   Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Geis, P ;
Grant, W ;
Carol, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (01) :227-236
[6]  
BOYER AL, 1998, MED PHYS, V25, pA200
[7]  
BRAHME A, 1988, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V164, P343
[8]   Three dimensional conformal treatment planning with multileaf collimators [J].
Brewster, L ;
Mohan, R ;
Mageras, G ;
Burman, C ;
Leibel, S ;
Fuks, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1081-1089
[9]   DOSE CALCULATION FOR PHOTON BEAMS WITH INTENSITY MODULATION GENERATED BY DYNAMIC JAW OR MULTILEAF COLLIMATIONS [J].
CHUI, CS ;
LOSASSO, T ;
SPIROU, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1237-1244
[10]  
Convery D, 1997, PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, P350