Interacting effects of photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux on net carbon assimilation and starch accumulation in potato leaves

被引:27
作者
Stutte, GW [1 ]
Yorio, NC [1 ]
Wheeler, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, OFF BIOMED OPERAT, KENNEDY SPACE CTR, FL 32899 USA
关键词
D O I
10.21273/JASHS.121.2.264
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effect of photoperiod (PP) on net carbon assimilation rate (A(net)) and starch accumulation in newly mature canopy leaves of 'Norland) potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) was determined under high (412 proportional to mol .(m-)2 . s(-1)) and low (263 proportional to mol . m(-2). s(-1)) photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) conditions. The A(net) decreased from 13.9 to 11.6 and 9.3 mu mol . m(-2). s(-1), and leaf starch increased from 70 to 129 and 118 mg . g(-1) drymass (DM) as photoperiod (PP) was increased from 12/12 to 18/6, and 24/0, respectively. Longer PP had a greater effect with high PPF conditions than with low PPF treatments, with high PPF showing greater decline in A(net). Photoperiod did not affect either the CO2 compensation point (50 mu mol . mol(-1)) or CO2 saturation point (1100-1200 mu mol . mol(-1)) for A(net). These results show an apparent limit to the amount of starch that can be stored (approximate to 15% DM) in potato leaves. An apparent feedback mechanism exists for regulating A(net) under high PPF, high CO2 and long PP, but there was no correlation between A(net) and starch concentration in individual leaves. This suggests that maximum A(net) cannot be sustained with elevated CO2 conditions under long PP (greater than or equal to 12 hours) and high PPF conditions. If a physiological limit exists for the fixation and transport of carbon, then increasing photoperiod and light intensity under high CO2 conditions Is not the most appropriate means to maximize the yield of potatoes.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 268
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AUCHTER EC, 1924, P AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V21, P199
[2]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES IN POTATO PLANTS UNDER CONTINUOUS IRRADIATION [J].
CAO, WX ;
TIBBITTS, TW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1991, 116 (03) :525-527
[3]  
Dwelle R. B., 1985, Potato physiology, P35
[4]   PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE OF POTATO CLONES (SOLANUM-TUBEROSUM-L) - COMPARATIVE DIFFERENCES IN DIURNAL PATTERNS, RESPONSE TO LIGHT LEVELS, AND ASSIMILATION THROUGH UPPER AND LOWER LEAF SURFACES [J].
DWELLE, RB ;
HURLEY, PJ ;
PAVEK, JJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 72 (01) :172-176
[5]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND TUBER GROWTH IN SOLANUM-TUBEROSUM-L [J].
FRIER, V .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1977, 28 (105) :999-1007
[6]  
Garner WW, 1923, J AGRIC RES, V23, P0871
[7]  
GEIGER DR, 1991, RECENT ADV PHLOEM TR, P1
[8]  
Gregory LE, 1965, ENCYCLOPEDIA PL PHYS, V15, P1328
[9]   REGULATION OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS BY SINK ACTIVITY - THE MISSING LINK [J].
HEROLD, A .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1980, 86 (02) :131-144
[10]   STARCH ACCUMULATION IN LEAVES OF POTATO (SOLANUM-TUBEROSUM L) DURING THE 1ST 18 DAYS OF PHOTOPERIOD TREATMENT [J].
LORENZEN, JH ;
EWING, EE .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1992, 69 (06) :481-485