Fracture process zone in granite

被引:169
作者
Zang, A [1 ]
Wagner, FC
Stanchits, S
Janssen, C
Dresen, G
机构
[1] Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] US Geol Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JB900239
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In uniaxial compression tests performed on Aue granite cores (diameter 50 mm, length 100 mm), a steel loading plate was used to induce the formation of a discrete shear fracture. A zone of distributed microcracks surrounds the tip of the propagating fracture. This process zone is imaged by locating acoustic emission events using 12 piezoceramic sensors attached to the samples. Propagation velocity of the process zone is varied by using the rate of acoustic emissions to control the applied axial force. The resulting velocities range from 2 mm/s in displacement-controlled tests to 2 mu m/s in tests controlled by acoustic emission rate. Wave velocities and amplitudes are monitored during fault formation. P waves transmitted through the approaching process zone show a drop in amplitude of 26 dB, and ultrasonic velocities are reduced by 10%. The width of the process zone is similar to 9 times the grain diameter inferred from acoustic data but is only 2 times the grain size from optical crack inspection. The process zone of fast propagating fractures is wider than for slow ones. The density of microcracks and acoustic emissions increases approaching the main fracture. Shear displacement scales linearly with fracture length. Fault plane solutions from acoustic events show similar orientation of nodal planes on both sides of the shear fracture. The ratio of the process zone width to the fault length in Aue granite ranges from 0.01 to 0.1 inferred from crack data and acoustic emissions, respectively. The fracture surface energy is estimated from microstructure analysis to be similar to 2 J. A lower bound estimate for the energy dissipated by acoustic events is 0.1 J.
引用
收藏
页码:23651 / 23661
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Barenblatt G. I, 1961, Adv. Appl. Mech., P3, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2]
[2]  
BARTON CC, 1982, 23 US S ROCK MECH AS
[3]  
CHESTER FM, 1986, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V124, P79, DOI 10.1007/BF00875720
[4]   GROWTH OF FAULTS BY ACCUMULATION OF SEISMIC SLIP [J].
COWIE, PA ;
SCHOLZ, CH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1992, 97 (B7) :11085-11095
[5]   PHYSICAL EXPLANATION FOR THE DISPLACEMENT LENGTH RELATIONSHIP OF FAULTS USING A POST-YIELD FRACTURE-MECHANICS MODEL [J].
COWIE, PA ;
SCHOLZ, CH .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 1992, 14 (10) :1133-1148
[6]   OVERVIEW NO 111 - CONCEPTS FOR BRIDGED CRACKS IN FRACTURE AND FATIGUE [J].
COX, BN ;
MARSHALL, DB .
ACTA METALLURGICA ET MATERIALIA, 1994, 42 (02) :341-363
[7]  
Dowding CH., 1983, 24 US S ROCK MECH AS
[8]   YIELDING OF STEEL SHEETS CONTAINING SLITS [J].
DUGDALE, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1960, 8 (02) :100-104
[9]   Crack growth criteria incorporating non-singular stresses: Size effect in apparent fracture toughness [J].
Dyskin, AV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1997, 83 (02) :191-206
[10]   SEISMIC EVIDENCE FOR AN EARTHQUAKE NUCLEATION PHASE [J].
ELLSWORTH, WL ;
BEROZA, GC .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5212) :851-855