Incidence of Hypoglycemia with Tight Glycemic Control Protocols: A Comparative Study

被引:11
作者
Anabtawi, A. [1 ]
Hurst, M. [1 ]
Titi, M. [1 ]
Patel, S. [1 ]
Palacio, C. [1 ]
Rajamani, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Unity Hlth Syst, Rochester, NY 14626 USA
关键词
INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; BLOOD-GLUCOSE CONTROL; HYPERGLYCEMIA; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2010.0009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Comparison of hypoglycemia incidence among tight glycemic control (TGC) protocols is a crucial aspect that has not been done in previous trials. This study compared the incidence of hypoglycemia using three TGC protocols in critically ill patients. Methodology: This was a prospective study of 420 patients over 18 months. Patients were divided into three groups by TGC protocol: A (modified Leuven protocol), B (Georgia Hospital Association protocol, target blood glucose [BG] 80-110 mg/dL), and C (modified Georgia Hospital Association protocol, target BG 90-140 mg/dL). End points included differences in the incidence of first-degree hypoglycemia (BG <= 60 mg/dL), second-degree hypoglycemia (BG <= 40 mg/dL), and hyperglycemia (BG <= 180 mg/dL). Results: A total of 34,497 BG samples were analyzed: group A, 11,202 (32.47%); group B, 9,627 (27.91%); and group C, 13,668 (39.62%). First-degree hypoglycemia was more frequent in group A (348 episodes [3.11%]) compared to group B (209 episodes [2.17%] [odds ratio (OR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.172, P = 0.001]) and group C (266 episodes [1.95%] [OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.37-1.89, P = 0.001]). Second-degree hypoglycemia was more frequent in group A (131 episodes [1.17%]) compared to group B (62 episodes [0.64%] [OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.22-1.72, P=0.001]) and group C (58 episodes [0.42%] [OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.04-3.79, P=0.001]). No significant difference was found when groups B and C were compared (P=0.10 and P=0.06, respectively). Hyperglycemia was significantly more common in group A (2,175 episodes [19.42%]) compared to group B (1,333 episodes [13.83%] [OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.39-1.62, P=0.001], but there was no significant difference compared to group C (2,560 episodes [18.73%] [P=0.17]). Conclusions: TGC protocols vary in their risk of inducing hypoglycemia. Whether this translates into differences in clinical outcomes such as mortality and adverse effects is still to be determined by future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 639
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Hypoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: Predisposing factors and association with mortality
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Tamim, Hani M.
    Rishu, Asgar H.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (09) : 2536 - 2544
  • [2] Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: A randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Dabbagh, Ousama C.
    Tamim, Hani M.
    Al-Shimemeri, Abdullah A.
    Memish, Ziad A.
    Haddad, Samir H.
    Syed, Sofia J.
    Giridhar, Hema R.
    Rishu, Asgar H.
    Al-Daker, Mouhamad O.
    Kahoul, Salim H.
    Britts, Riette J.
    Sakkijha, Maram H.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (12) : 3190 - 3197
  • [3] Bode Bruce W, 2004, Endocr Pract, V10 Suppl 2, P71
  • [4] Practical management of diabetes in critically ill patients
    Boord, JB
    Graber, AL
    Christman, JW
    Powers, AC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 164 (10) : 1763 - 1767
  • [5] Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis
    Brunkhorst, Frank M.
    Engel, Christoph
    Bloos, Frank
    Meier-Hellmann, Andreas
    Ragaller, Max
    Weiler, Norbert
    Moerer, Onnen
    Gruendling, Matthias
    Oppert, Michael
    Grond, Stefan
    Olthoff, Derk
    Jaschinski, Ulrich
    John, Stefan
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Welte, Tobias
    Schaefer, Martin
    Kern, Peter
    Kuhnt, Evelyn
    Kiehntopf, Michael
    Hartog, Christiane
    Natanson, Charles
    Loeffler, Markus
    Reinhart, Konrad
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (02) : 125 - 139
  • [6] Accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients
    Critchell, C. Dana
    Savarese, Vincent
    Callahan, Amy
    Aboud, Christine
    Jabbour, Serge
    Marik, Paul
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (12) : 2079 - 2084
  • [7] Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
    Finfer, S.
    Blair, D.
    Bellomo, R.
    McArthur, C.
    Mitchell, I.
    Myburgh, J.
    Norton, R.
    Potter, J.
    Chittock, D.
    Dhingra, V.
    Foster, D.
    Cook, D.
    Dodek, P.
    Hebert, P.
    Henderson, W.
    Heyland, D.
    McDonald, E.
    Ronco, J.
    Schweitzer, L.
    Peto, R.
    Sandercock, P.
    Sprung, C.
    Young, J. D.
    Su, S.
    Heritier, S.
    Li, Q.
    Bompoint, S.
    Billot, L.
    Crampton, L.
    Darcy, F.
    Jayne, K.
    Kumarasinghe, V.
    Little, L.
    McEvoy, S.
    MacMahon, S.
    Pandey, S.
    Ryan, S.
    Shukla, R.
    Vijayan, B.
    Atherton, S.
    Bell, J.
    Hadfield, L.
    Hourigan, C.
    McArthur, C.
    Newby, L.
    Simmonds, C.
    Buhr, H.
    Eccleston, M.
    McGuinness, S.
    Parke, R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1283 - 1297
  • [8] Computerized intensive insulin dosing can mitigate hypoglycemia and achieve tight glycemic control when glucose measurement is performed frequently and on time
    Juneja, Rattan
    Roudebush, Corbin P.
    Nasraway, Stanley A.
    Golas, Adam A.
    Jacobi, Judith
    Carroll, Joni
    Nelson, Deborah
    Abad, Victor J.
    Flanders, Samuel J.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (05):
  • [9] Association between hyperglycemia and increased hospital mortality in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients
    Krinsley, JS
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 78 (12) : 1471 - 1478
  • [10] Intensive insulin therapy protects the endothelium of critically ill patients
    Langouche, L
    Vanhorebeek, I
    Vlasselaers, D
    Vander Perre, S
    Wouters, PJ
    Skogstrand, K
    Hansen, TK
    Van den Berghe, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2005, 115 (08) : 2277 - 2286