Sensitivity of moist convection to environmental humidity

被引:387
作者
Derbyshire, SH
Beau, I
Bechtold, P
Grandpeix, JY
Piriou, JM
Redelsperger, JL
Soares, PMM
机构
[1] Meteorol Off, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
[2] Meteo France, ENM, Toulouse, France
[3] Observ Midi Pyrenees, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[4] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading RG2 9AX, Berks, England
[5] Meteorol Dynam Lab, Paris, France
[6] Meteo France, CNRM, Toulouse, France
[7] Inst Super Engn, Lisbon, Portugal
[8] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Geofis, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
cumulus convection; humidity sensitivity; model intercomparison;
D O I
10.1256/qj.03.130
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
As part of the EUROCS (EUROpean Cloud Systems study) project, cloud-resolving model (CRM) simulations and parallel single-column model (SCM) tests of the sensitivity of moist atmospheric convection to midtropospheric humidity are presented. This sensitivity is broadly Supported by observations and some previous model studies, but is still poorly quantified. Mixing between clouds and environment is a key mechanism, central to many of the fundamental differences between convection schemes. Here, we define an idealized quasi-steady 'testbed', in which the large-scale environment is assumed to adjust the local mean profiles on a timescale of one hour. We then test sensitivity to the target profiles at heights above 2 km. Two independent CRMs agree reasonably well in their response to the different background profiles and both show strong deep precipitating convection in the more moist cases, but only shallow convection in the driest case. The CRM results also appear to be numerically robust. All the SCMs, most of which are one-dimensional versions of global climate models (GCMs), show sensitivity to humidity but differ in various ways from the CRMs. Some of the SCMs are improved in the light of these comparisons, with GCM improvements documented elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页码:3055 / 3079
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ARAKAWA A, 1974, J ATMOS SCI, V31, P674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:IOACCE>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Bader MJ., 1995, Images in weather forecasting
[4]  
Bechtold P, 2001, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V127, P869, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712757309
[5]  
BLYTH AM, 1988, J ATMOS SCI, V45, P3944, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3944:ASOTSO>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
BOUGEAULT P, 1985, MON WEATHER REV, V113, P2108, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<2108:ASPOTL>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection overland [J].
Brown, AR ;
Cederwall, RT ;
Chlond, A ;
Duynkerke, PG ;
Golaz, JC ;
Khairoutdinov, M ;
Lewellen, DC ;
Lock, AP ;
MacVean, MK ;
Moeng, CH ;
Neggers, RAJ ;
Siebesma, AP ;
Stevens, B .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 128 (582) :1075-1093
[10]  
DONNER LJ, 1993, J ATMOS SCI, V50, P889, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<0889:ACPIMF>2.0.CO