Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China's pollution levy system

被引:184
作者
Wang, H [1 ]
Wheeler, D [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Dev Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
industrial pollution; pollution charge; effectiveness; enforcement;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2004.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using data from 3000 Chinese factories, we estimate an econometric model of endogenous enforcement in which factories' levy rates and emissions are jointly determined by the interaction of local and national enforcement factors, abatement costs and regulator-manager negotiations that are sensitive to plant characteristics. Our results demonstrate the significant deterrent impact of a system that combines progressive financial penalties and self-reporting with few options for contesting regulatory decisions, despite the prevalence of state enterprises and developing-country conditions in China. Despite central pressure for uniformity in enforcement, we find great regional diversity that reflects local conditions. We also find that pollution control through financial incentives has a much greater impact on production processes than on end-of-pipe abatement. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 196
页数:23
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LAW POLICY Q
[2]  
BAUMOL MJ, 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY
[3]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[4]  
BOHM RA, 1998, ENV TAXES CHINAS BOL, P138
[5]  
*CRAES, 1997, REP STUD DES IMPL CH
[6]   What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Hettige, H ;
Wheeler, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 39 (01) :39-66
[7]   Inspections, pollution prices, and environmental performance: evidence from China [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Laplante, B ;
Mamingi, N ;
Wang, H .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (03) :487-498
[8]  
Dasgupta S, 1997, 1704 WORLD BANK
[9]   HONESTY AND EVASION IN THE TAX COMPLIANCE GAME [J].
ERARD, B ;
FEINSTEIN, JS .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 25 (01) :1-19