Characterization of proton affinity reactions in polyelectrolytes: Discrete vs continuous distribution of sites approach

被引:7
作者
Martinez, GA
Traina, SJ
Logan, TJ
机构
[1] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Agron & Soils, Agr Expt Stn, Rio Piedras, PR 00928 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
proton affinity; humic substances; polyacrylic acid;
D O I
10.1006/jcis.1997.5299
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The chemical implications of the fitting parameters employed by two empirical models on the characterization of complexation reactions by dissolved humic substances were evaluated on various polyelectrolyte systems, Potentiometric titrations of polyacrylic acid (PAA), and different mixtures of PAA and polyvinylsulfonic acid, were conducted at different ionic strengths, The Scatchard Quasiparticle model (QM) and the Gaussian distribution model (GM) were utilized to describe the experimental data, Both models provided an adequate representation of the results, However, the QM required three different classes of functional groups (five fitting parameters), whereas the GM required only one type of binding site (two fitting parameters) to achieve that goal, Based on the chemical nature of the polymers, it was concluded that the GM offered a more realistic description of the results, The effects of electrostatics were also evaluated, A successful description of the experimental data suggested that such effects could be adequately accounted for with the model employed, However, geometry optimization calculations indicated that the fitting parameters held little relation to the physical reality of the systems, thus invalidating any assumptions based on the results of the fitting exercise. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 62
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1948, THEORY STABILITY LYO
[2]  
*AUT INC, 1992, HYP REL 2 WIND REF M
[3]  
BARTSCHAT BM, 1990, THESIS MIT
[4]   Proton binding and cadmium complexation constants for a soil humic acid using a quasi-particle model [J].
Bolton, KA ;
Sjoberg, S ;
Evans, LJ .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (04) :1064-1072
[5]   PROTON BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES .1. ELECTROSTATIC EFFECTS [J].
DEWIT, JCM ;
VANRIEMSDIJK, WH ;
KOOPAL, LK .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (10) :2005-2014
[6]   Quantitative approach to humic acid associations [J].
Engebretson, RR ;
Amos, T ;
vonWandruszka, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03) :990-997
[7]  
EPHRAIM JH, 1995, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V29, P662
[8]   ADSORPTION OF POLYACRYLIC-ACID AT OXIDE WATER INTERFACES [J].
GEBHARDT, JE ;
FUERSTENAU, DW .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES, 1983, 7 (03) :221-231
[9]   ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC-MATTER FRACTIONS ON IRON-OXIDE [J].
GU, BH ;
SCHMITT, J ;
CHEN, Z ;
LIANG, LY ;
MCCARTHY, JF .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1995, 59 (02) :219-229
[10]   Metal ion binding by humic acid: Application of the NICA-Donnan model [J].
Kinniburgh, DG ;
Milne, CJ ;
Benedetti, MF ;
Pinheiro, JP ;
Filius, J ;
Koopal, LK ;
VanRiemsdijk, WH .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (05) :1687-1698